The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development and process evaluation of an Internet-based physical activity behaviour change program
Abstract
Objectives Limited research exists addressing issues of website development and attitudes towards websites that promote physical activity. This paper describes the design and process evaluation of a physical activity intervention, from a randomised trial (RT) that examined the effectiveness of delivery modes (face-to-face, Internet-mediated (combined Internet and face-to-face) and Internet-only). Methods Evaluation surveys were completed at the end of the RT intervention (n=159), and a random sample (n=23) participated in focus group discussions. Differences were assessed using ANOVA, t-tests, and qualitative analysis. Results Face-to-face participants were more satisfied with their group allocation than the Internet groups. Internet groups reported accessing the Internet at home, and that they liked the self-paced nature of the website. Difficulties associated with time and motivation were raised by the Internet groups. No differences were found for content acceptability and credibility. Website usability scores were high for both Internet groups. Conclusion These findings support the use of the Internet in terms of content satisfaction and usability; however, issues were raised regarding the acceptability of an Internet-based program when traditional face-to-face delivery options are available. Practice implications Identifying avenues to support user perceptions of 'motivation', and mechanisms for enhancing engagement and retention, and user acceptability are required.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, studies show that web-based interventions can increase physical activity rates among participants, particularly when interventions integrate theory-based interactive components (Steele et al., 2007;Ferney & Marshall, 2006).”
From A Pilot Study of a Cohort-Based Solution-Focused Wellness Group for Graduate Students Using Solution-Focused Coaching 🇵🇱 🇷🇴 (2022) · cites this paper as Steele et al., 2007
Citations
Cites
Health Promotion by Social Cognitive Means
Bandura, A. (2004) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/1090198104263660 · Cited by 7,238
Self-management education: History, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms
Lorig, K. R., & Holman, H. R. (2003) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1207/s15324796abm2601_01 · Cited by 4,094
Health promotion from the perspective of Social Cognitive Theory
Bandura, A. (1998) · Psychology & Health · doi:10.1080/08870449808407422 · Cited by 3,087
The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activityA systematic review1 and 2
KAHN, E., RAMSEY, L., BROWNSON, R., HEATH, G., HOWZE, E., POWELL, K., STONE, E., RAJAB, M., & CORSO, P. (2002) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00434-8 · Cited by 2,022
Consumer health information seeking on the internet: the state of the art
Cline, R. J. W. (2001) · Health Education Research · doi:10.1093/her/16.6.671 · Cited by 1,708
Lorentzon, M. (1993) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1993.180610057.x · Cited by 1,389
Sampling in qualitative inquiry
Kuzel, A. J. (1992) · Cited by 1,316
Using Internet technology to deliver a behavioral weight loss program
Tate, D. F. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.285.9.1172 · Cited by 925
The evolution of physical activity recommendations: how much is enough?
Blair, S. N., LaMonte, M. J., & Nichaman, M. Z. (2004) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/79.5.913s · Cited by 546
Impact of a patient-centered, computer-based health information/support system
Gustafson, D. (1999) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00108-1 · Cited by 461
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Patrick, 1999, Prevention, public health, and interactive health communication, Am J Prev Med, 16, 46
Cited by
Portnoy, D. B., Scott-Sheldon, L. A. J., Johnson, B. T., & Carey, M. P. (2008) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.02.014 · Cited by 451
Yardley, L., Morrison, L. G., Andreou, P., Joseph, J., & Little, P. (2010) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/1472-6947-10-52 · Cited by 101
A Front-of-Pack Nutrition Logo: A Quantitative and Qualitative Process Evaluation in the Netherlands
Vyth, E. L., Steenhuis, I. H. M., Mallant, S. F., Mol, Z. L., Brug, J., Temminghoff, M., Feunekes, G. I., Jansen, L., Verhagen, H., & Seidell, J. C. (2009) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730903204247 · Cited by 100
Impact Evaluation of a Pilot Web-Based Intervention to Increase Physical Activity
Grim, M., Hortz, B., & Petosa, R. (2011) · American Journal of Health Promotion · doi:10.4278/ajhp.081216-arb-307 · Cited by 40
Nordin, C. A., Michaelson, P., Gard, G., & Eriksson, M. K. (2016) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.5634 · Cited by 38
“Time and motivation are reported reasons for not using Web-based treatments [64], and patients with pain problems may prefer face-to-face therapy when there is a choice [64,65].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Steele, R., Mummery, K. W., & Dwyer, T.
- Venue
- Patient Education and Counseling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-07
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 127-136
- ISSN
- 0738-3991
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 39
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development and process evaluation of an Internet-based physical activity behaviour change program. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pec.2007.02.013
- The paper
- Steele, R., Mummery, K. W., & Dwyer, T. (2007). Development and process evaluation of an Internet-based physical activity behaviour change program. Patient Education and Counseling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2007.02.013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.