Cited by 19Health Policy Implementation ScienceMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

The systematic implementation of Acceptance & Commitment Therapy (ACT) in Dutch multidisciplinary chronic pain rehabilitation

Trompetter, Hester R., Schreurs, Karlein M.G., Heuts, Peter H.T.G., Vollenbroek-Hutten, Miriam M.·2014·Patient Education and Counseling

Abstract

Objective This study evaluates the implementation of Acceptance & Commitment Therapy (ACT) in Dutch chronic pain rehabilitation centers. Changes in multidisciplinary professionals' self-perceived competencies in working with ACT were evaluated and corroborated with patients' ratings of treatment adherence. To inform subsequent implementation efforts, relevant determinants of implementation success were monitored and the relationship with self-perceived competencies over time was explored.Methods Data was gathered from 111 professionals, 9 managers and 79 patients using questionnaires at the start (T0), halfway (T1) and end (T2) of implementation, and at the end of treatment.Results All professionals adhered to ACT, improved significantly in self-perceived competencies over time and rated competence in working with ACT ≥ adequate at T2. Determinants of success were evaluated extremely positive by professionals and management. Professionals' self-perceived competencies at T2 were most strongly related to ratings of more workload (b=-.43), and experienced difficulties in working with ACT (b=-.38) at T0 and T1.Conclusion Multidisciplinary chronic pain rehabilitation professionals rated their improvement in working with ACT positively during the implementation period. Impeding and facilitating factors were explored successfully.Practice implications A multi-faceted, long-term, educational, train-the-trainer approach may help to guide systematic changes in multidisciplinary treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.019

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trompetter, H. R., Schreurs, K. M. G., Heuts, P. H. T. G., & Vollenbroek-Hutten, M. M.
Affiliations
  • Roessingh Research and Development (NL)
  • Adelante (NL)
Venue
Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-08
Volume
96
Issue
2
Pages
249-255
ISSN
0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026167204
Cited by
19
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, chronic pain rehabilitation, multidisciplinary rehabilitation team, perceived competence, medication adherence, implementation factors, trainer training, professional education
MeSH terms
Adult, Clinical Competence, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patient Care Team, Professional-Patient Relations, Surveys and Questionnaires, Rehabilitation Centers, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, Chronic Pain, Pain Management, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review