Cited by 615Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and TreatmentMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

Multidisciplinary treatment for chronic pain: a systematic review of interventions and outcomes

Open access
Scascighini, L., Toma, V., Dober-Spielmann, S., Sprott, H.·2008·Rheumatology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview of the effectiveness of multidisciplinary treatments of chronic pain and investigate about their differential effects on outcome in various pain conditions and of different multidisciplinary treatments, settings or durations. METHODS: In this article, the authors performed a systematic review of all currently available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) fulfilling the inclusion criteria, by using a recently developed rating system aimed to assess the strength of evidence with regard to the methodological quality of the trials. RESULTS: Compared with other non-disciplinary treatments, moderate evidence of higher effectiveness for multidisciplinary interventions was shown. In contrast to no treatment or standard medical treatment, strong evidence was detected in favour of multidisciplinary treatments. The evidence that comprehensive inpatient programmes were more beneficial that outpatient programmes was moderate. Fibromyalgia and chronic back pain patients tended to profit more substantially than patients with diverse origins or chronic pain diagnoses. No evidence was found that treatment variables, such as duration or programme components, were influential for the success of the intervention. CONCLUSION: A standard of multidisciplinary programmes should be internationally established to guarantee generally good outcomes in the treatment of chronic pain. Our results highlight the lack of quality of design, execution or reporting of many of the RCTs included in this article. Future studies should more specifically focus on differential effects of treatment components and patient variables, allowing the identification of subgroups, which most probably would profit from multidisciplinary pain programmes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/rheumatology/ken021

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Keefe FJ. Behavioural assessment and treatment of chronic pain: current status and future directions. J Consult Clin Psychol 1982;50:896-911.
  2. Gowans SE, deHueck A, Voss S, Richardson M. A randomized, controlled trial of exercise and education for individuals with fibromyalgia. Arthritis Care Res 1999;12:120-8.
  3. Schultz J. Das autogenen training: Konzentrative Selbsentspannung. 19th edn. Stuttgart (D): Thieme Verlag, 1991.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scascighini, L., Toma, V., Dober-Spielmann, S., & Sprott, H.
Affiliations
University Hospital Zurich (CH)
Venue
Rheumatology
Published
2008-01-29
Volume
47
Issue
5
Pages
670-678
ISSN
  • 1462-0324 (ISSN-L)
  • 1462-0332
OpenAlex
W2119136552
Cited by
613
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 28
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lara D. Veeken (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
chronic pain, multidisciplinary pain management, pain management program, fibromyalgia, chronic back pain, treatment effectiveness, methodological quality of trials, treatment duration, treatment components
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Combined Modality Therapy, Exercise Therapy, Humans, Pain, Psychotherapy, Group, Quality of Life, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Case-Control Studies, Physical Therapy Modalities, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review