Cited by 143Obesity and Health PracticesPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Patients who feel judged about their weight have lower trust in their primary care providers

Open access
Gudzune, Kimberly A., Bennett, Wendy L., Cooper, Lisa A., Bleich, Sara N.·2014·Patient Education and Counseling

Abstract

Objective To evaluate whether overweight and obese patients have less trust in their primary care providers (PCPs) if they feel judged about their weight by these PCPs. Methods We conducted a national internet-based survey of 600 adults engaged in primary care with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m(2) in 2012. Our dependent variable was high patient trust in their PCP (score ≥ 8/10). Our independent variable was "feeling judged about my weight by my PCP" dichotomized as "often/sometimes" versus "never." We conducted a multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for patient and PCP factors using survey weights. Results Overall, 21% felt that their PCP judged them about their weight. Respondents who perceived judgment were significantly less likely to report high trust in their PCP [OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.31-0.98]. Conclusion While only a fifth of overweight and obese patients perceived weight-related judgment from their PCPs, these patients were significantly less likely to report high trust in these providers. Given patients' decreased trust in providers who convey weight-related judgment, our results raise concerns about potential effects on the doctor-patient relationship and patient outcomes. Practice implications Addressing provider stigma toward patients with obesity could help build trust in these patient-provider relationships and improve quality of care.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pec.2014.06.019

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients who report having experienced weight bias in the healthcare setting have poor treatment outcomes and might be more likely to avoid future care.

    “patients who report having experienced weight bias in the healthcare setting have poor treatment outcomes40 and might be more likely to avoid future care41.”

    From Joint international consensus statement for ending stigma of obesity (2020) · cites this paper as [40]

    The Conclusion reports lower trust among patients who felt judged about their weight and raises concern about possible effects on care and patient outcomes. It does not establish that those patients had poor treatment outcomes. The separate claim about avoiding future care carries citation 41, not the citation attached to treatment outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Berry, 2008, Patients’ commitment to their primary physician and why it matters, Ann Fam Med, 6, 6, 10.1370/afm.757 · DOI
  2. Ratanawongsa, 2011, Challenges in primary care relationships: seeing it from both sides, Patient Educ Couns, 85, 40, 10.1016/j.pec.2010.07.042 · DOI
  3. Jones, 2012, Patient trust in physicians and adoption of lifestyle behaviors to control high blood pressure, Patient Educ Couns, 89, 57, 10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.003 · DOI
  4. Ratanawongsa, 2013, Communication and medication refill adherence: the Diabetes Study of Northern California, JAMA Intern Med, 173, 210, 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.1216 · DOI
  5. Cuffee, 2013, Reported racial discrimination, trust in physicians, and medication adherence among inner-city African Americans with hypertension, Am J Public Health, 103, e55, 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301554 · DOI
  6. Puhl, 2001, Bias, discrimination, and obesity, Obes Res, 9, 788, 10.1038/oby.2001.108 · DOI
  7. Puhl, 2013, The effect of physicians’ body weight on patient attitudes: implications for physician selection, trust and adherence to medical advice, Int J Obes, 37, 1415, 10.1038/ijo.2013.33 · DOI
  8. Puhl, 2006, Confronting and coping with weight stigma: an investigation of overweight and obese adults, Obesity (Silver Spring), 14, 1802, 10.1038/oby.2006.208 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Huizinga, 2009, Physician respect for patients with obesity, J Gen Intern Med, 24, 1236, 10.1007/s11606-009-1104-8 · DOI
  10. Buxton, 2013, Obese women's perceptions and experiences of healthcare and primary care providers, Nurs Res, 62, 252, 10.1097/NNR.0b013e318299a6ba · DOI
  11. Bleich, 2013, How does physician BMI impact patient trust and perceived stigma, Prev Med, 57, 120, 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.05.005 · DOI
  12. Puhl, 2013, Motivating or stigmatizing? Public perceptions of weight-related language used by health providers, Int J Obes (London), 37, 6122, 10.1038/ijo.2013.17 · DOI
  13. Keeter, 2000, Consequences of reducing non-response in a national telephone survey, Public Opin. Q., 64, 125, 10.1086/317759 · DOI
  14. Johnson, 2004, Patient race/ethnicity and quality of patient–physician communication during medical visits, Am J Public Health, 94, 2084, 10.2105/AJPH.94.12.2084 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Ghods, 2008, Patient–physician communication in primary care visits with African–Americans and whites with depression, J Gen Intern Med, 23, 600, 10.1007/s11606-008-0539-7 · DOI
  16. Mechanic, 2000, Concepts of trust among patients with serious illness, Soc Sci Med, 51, 657, 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00014-9 · DOI · Paper page
  17. O’Malley, 2004, The role of trust in use of preventive services among low-income African–American women, Prev Med, 38, 777, 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.01.018 · DOI
  18. Amy, 2006, Barriers to routine gynecological cancer screening for White and African–American obese women, Int J Obes (Lond), 30, 147, 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803105 · DOI
  19. Heo, 2004, Overweight, obesity, and colorectal cancer screening: disparity beween men and women, BMC Public Health, 4, 53, 10.1186/1471-2458-4-53 · DOI
  20. Maruthur, 2009, mammography: a systematic review and meta-analysis, J Gen Intern Med, 24, 665, 10.1007/s11606-009-0939-3 · DOI
  21. Maruthur, 2009, The association of obesity and cervical cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Obesity (Silver Spring), 17, 375, 10.1038/oby.2008.480 · DOI
  22. Gudzune, 2013, Physicians build less rapport with obese patients, Obesity (Silver Spring), 21, 2146, 10.1002/oby.20384 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Swift, 2013, Are anti-stigma films a useful strategy for reducing weight bias among trainee healthcare professionals Results of a pilot randomized controlled trial, Obes Facts, 6, 91, 10.1159/000348714 · DOI
  24. Gudzune, 2013, Doctor shopping my overweight and obese patients is associated with increased healthcare utilization, Obesity (Silver Spring), 21, 1328, 10.1002/oby.20189 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gudzune, K. A., Bennett, W. L., Cooper, L. A., & Bleich, S. N.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
97
Issue
1
Pages
128-131
ISSN
0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045790156
Cited by
143
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
6.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (P50HL0105187, K23HL116601, K23HL098476, K24HL083113, K01HL096409)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
obesity, overweight, weight stigma, physician-patient trust, primary care, physician-patient relationship, provider stigma, body mass index
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Negativism, Obesity, Patients, Perception, Physician-Patient Relations, Primary Health Care, Self Concept, Socioeconomic Factors, Stereotyping, Body Mass Index, Logistic Models, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Internet, Trust, Overweight, Physicians, Primary Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review