Cited by 57Obesity and Health PracticesPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareMental Health Treatment and Access

A model of weight‐based stigma in health care and utilization outcomes: Evidence from the learning health systems network

Open access
Phelan, Sean M., Bauer, Katherine W., Bradley, David, Bradley, Steven M., Haller, Irina V., Mundi, Manpreet S., Finney Rutten, Lila J., Schroeder, Darrell R. +2 more·2022·Obesity Science & Practice

Abstract

Objective: Obesity is stigmatized and people with obesity report experiencing stigmatizing situations when seeking health care. The implications of these experiences are not well understood. This study tests an indirect effects model of negative care experiences as an intermediate variable between obesity and care avoidance/utilization and switching primary care doctors. Methods: A survey was completed by 2380 primary care patients in the Learning Health Systems Network (LHSNet) Clinical Data Research Network with a BMI >25 kg/m 2. Measures included scales assessing stigmatizing situations, perceived patient‐centered communication, perceived respect, having delayed needed care, and having looked for a new primary doctor in the past 12 months. Sequential and serial indirect effects of care experiences and respect in the association between BMI and care utilization outcomes was modeled. Results: The hypothesized model was supported by findings. The associations between BMI and delaying needed care (OR = 1.06, p < 0.001) and attempting to switch primary doctors (OR = 1.02, p = 0.04) was mediated by both stigmatizing situations experienced in a health care context and lower patient‐centered communication. Lower perceived respect mediated the association between care experiences and utilization outcomes. Conclusions: People with higher BMIs may avoid care or switch doctors as a result of stigmatizing experiences and poor communication with doctors. These outcomes may contribute to morbidity in people with obesity if they delay or avoid care for health concerns when symptoms first present.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/osp4.553

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Weight stigma and body shame also obstruct use of health care, especially for people with higher body weight, prediabetes, or type 2 diabetes.

    “Weight stigma and body shame are also barriers to health care utilization (Mensinger et al., 2018; Phelan et al., 2022; Prunty et al., 2023), particularly among those with higher body weight (Curran et al., 2024), prediabetes (Salvia et al., 2023), and T2D (Himmelstein & Puhl, 2021; Svenningsson et al., 2011).”

    From A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-Informed Diabetes Prevention Program Reduces Body Shame and Distress. (2025) · cites this paper as Phelan et al., 2022

    The Discussion reports that, among patients with BMI above 24.9, stigmatizing health care experiences were associated with delaying needed care and seeking a new doctor. It mentions embarrassment about not losing weight as a possible explanation, but does not establish body shame as a separate barrier. The prediabetes and type 2 diabetes qualifications are attached to other citations in the citing sentence, not to Phelan et al. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

10 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [12]Phelan SM, Lynch B, Blake KD, et al. The impact of obesity on patient‐centered communication. Obes Sci Pract. 2018; 4(4): 338‐ 346. 30151228 PMC6105704
  2. [14]Wong MS, Gudzune KA, Bleich SN. Provider communication quality: influence of patients' weight and race. Patient Educ Counsel. 2015; 98(4): 492‐ 498. PMC4379992 25617907
  3. [18]Zolnierek KB, Dimatteo MR. Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: a meta‐analysis. Med Care. 2009; 47(8): 826‐ 834. 19584762 PMC2728700
  4. [21]Stewart M, Brown JB, Donner A, et al. The impact of patient‐centered care on outcomes. J Fam Pract. 2000; 49(9): 796‐ 804. 11032203
  5. [27]Branscombe NR, Ellemers N, Spears R, Doosje B. The context and content of social identity threat. In: Ellemers N, Spears R, Doosje B, eds. Social identity: Context, Commitment, Content. Oxford: Blackwell; 1999: 35‐ 55.
  6. [46]Hayes AF. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression‐Based Approach. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2017.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Phelan, S. M., Bauer, K. W., Bradley, D., Bradley, S. M., Haller, I. V., Mundi, M. S., Finney Rutten, L. J., Schroeder, D. R., Fischer, K., & Croghan, I.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US)
  • Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (US)
  • Essentia Health (US)
  • Department of Quantitative Health Sciences Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA
Corresponding author
Phelan, Sean M.
Venue
Obesity Science & Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-08-27
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
139-146
ISSN
2055-2238 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3195633303
Cited by
57
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
10.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity Science & Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (CDRN‐1501‐26638)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
obesity, weight stigma, health care utilization, care avoidance, patient-centered communication, perceived respect, delayed care, primary care patients, body mass index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review