Cited by 18Obesity and Health PracticesEating Disorders and BehaviorsPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Weight‐Related Terms Differentially Affect Self‐Efficacy and Perception of Obesity

Open access
Hopkins, Christina M., Bennett, Gary G.·2018·Obesity

Abstract

Objective: Little work has explored the effect of weight‐related terms on treatment initiation; only one study has investigated weight‐related terms and the psychological constructs associated with treatment uptake. The present study examines the effects of four common weight‐related terms on treatment initiation and the moderating effect of weight bias internalization. Methods: Adult participants with overweight and obesity (n = 436) were recruited online and asked to read three vignettes describing clinical encounters; the weight‐related term (i.e., “weight,” “BMI,” “obesity,” or “fat”) was varied randomly. Participants then reported self‐efficacy, cognitive and emotional illness beliefs about obesity (i.e., illness perception), and interest in a weight loss program. Results: The term “obesity” resulted in the greatest self‐efficacy and perceived control over obesity. “Fat” resulted in the least illness coherence (i.e., understanding of obesity). Weight bias internalization did not moderate the effect of term on self‐efficacy, nor did it moderate illness perception. No differences in weight loss program enrollment were observed. Conclusions: Use of the term “obesity” may promote patients’ perceived control and self‐efficacy. Use of “fat” should be avoided. Results suggest that, despite patient and clinician preference for euphemistic weight terms, use of clinical language such as “obesity” may perform better in provider intervention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/oby.22255

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Weight stigma shapes cognitive and emotional factors, including how threatening illness seems, beliefs about whether diabetes can be prevented, and worry about symptoms.

    “Weight stigma impacts cognitive and affective factors such as perceptions of illness threat, including beliefs about diabetes preventability and concern about developing associated symptoms (Hopkins & Bennett, 2018)”

    From A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-Informed Diabetes Prevention Program Reduces Body Shame and Distress. (2025) · cites this paper as Hopkins & Bennett, 2018

    The Results section reports that weight-related terms affected perceived control over and understanding of obesity, supporting a narrower claim about cognitive illness perceptions. It found no significant effect on emotional illness perceptions, and the paper does not report effects of weight stigma on beliefs about diabetes preventability or worry about developing symptoms. Its study varied clinical terms rather than weight stigma itself. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Weight-focused prevention approaches can lower self-efficacy.

    “Weight-focused prevention approaches can lower self-efficacy (Hopkins & Bennett, 2018)”

    From A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-Informed Diabetes Prevention Program Reduces Body Shame and Distress. (2025) · cites this paper as Hopkins & Bennett, 2018

    The Results section reports lower self-efficacy after vignettes using “weight” than after otherwise identical vignettes using “obesity.” This supports the possibility that weight-related language can affect self-efficacy, but the study tested terminology in simulated clinical encounters, not weight-focused prevention approaches. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bandura A. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In: Pajares F, Urdan T, eds. Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing; 2005:307-337.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hopkins, C. M., & Bennett, G. G.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Hopkins, Christina M.
Venue
Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-09
Volume
26
Issue
9
Pages
1405-1411
ISSN
  • 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-739X
OpenAlex
W2890030412
Cited by
17
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
3.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
self-efficacy, illness perception, weight bias internalization, perceived control, euphemistic expressions, body mass index, clinical language, overweight
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Weight, Female, Humans, Language, Male, Obesity, Perception, Self Efficacy, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review