Cited by 135Diabetes Management and EducationHealth disparities and outcomesHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

Social support and self-management capabilities in diabetes patients: An international observational study

Open access
Koetsenruijter, Jan, van Eikelenboom, Nathalie, van Lieshout, Jan, Vassilev, Ivo, Lionis, Christos, Todorova, Elka, Portillo, Mari Carmen, Foss, Christina +7 more·2016·Patient Education and Counseling

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to explore which aspects of social networks are related to self-management capabilities and if these networks have the potential to reduce the adverse health effects of deprivation. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study we recruited type 2 diabetes patients in six European countries. Data on self-management capabilities was gathered through written questionnaires and data on social networks characteristics and social support through subsequent personal/telephone interviews. We used regression modelling to assess the effect of social support and education on self-management capabilities. RESULTS: In total 1692 respondents completed the questionnaire and the interview. Extensive informational networks, emotional networks, and attendance of community organisations were linked to better self-management capabilities. The association of self-management capabilities with informational support was especially strong in the low education group, whereas the association with emotional support was stronger in the high education group. CONCLUSION: Some of the social network characteristics showed a positive relation to self-management capabilities. The effect of informational support was strongest in low education populations and may therefore provide a possibility to reduce the adverse impact of low education on self-management capabilities. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Self-management support interventions that take informational support in patients' networks into account may be most effective, especially in deprived populations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pec.2015.10.029

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Enhancing clients' role management (activities and social interaction domains) and strategies to find, access, or manage formal and informal supports and resources (resources domain) are part of managing and living with chronic conditions.

    “Enhancing clients’ role management (ie, activities and social interaction domains) and strategies to find, access, or manage formal and informal supports and resources (ie, resources domain) are also part of managing and living with chronic conditions [76-78].”

    From Features of Structured, One-to-One Videoconference Interventions That Actively Engage People in the Management of Their Chronic Conditions: Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as [77]

    The Introduction describes social networks helping patients identify and connect with people, groups, organisations and online resources for information and support. The Practice implications section also links participation in community organisations to self-management. The paper does not describe role management in activities and social interaction domains as part of managing chronic conditions; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koetsenruijter, J., van Eikelenboom, N., van Lieshout, J., Vassilev, I., Lionis, C., Todorova, E., Portillo, M. C., Foss, C., Serrano Gil, M., Roukova, P., Angelaki, A., Mujika, A., Knutsen, I. R., Rogers, A., & Wensing, M.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • University of Crete (GR)
  • University of National and World Economy (BG)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • Universidad de Navarra (ES)
Corresponding author
Koetsenruijter, Jan
Venue
Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
99
Issue
4
Pages
638-643
ISSN
0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2183499563
Cited by
135
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3
FWCI
6.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Union Seventh Framework Programme FP7 (279081)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, social support, social networks, information support, emotional support, educational attainment, socioeconomic deprivation, community organizations
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Europe, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Rural Population, Self Care, Social Support, Socioeconomic Factors, Urban Population

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review