Cited by 536Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchAsthma and respiratory diseasesNursing care and research

Self-management education for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Open access
Effing, Tanja, Monninkhof, Evelyn EM, van der Valk, Paul P.D.L.P.M., Zielhuis, Gerhard GA, Walters, E. Haydn, van der Palen, Job J, Zwerink, Marlies·2007·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is great interest in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and the associated large burden of disease. COPD is characterised by frequent day by day fluctuations, and repetitive clinical exacerbations are typical. Self-management is a term applied to educational programmes aimed at teaching skills needed to carry out medical regimens specific to the disease, guide health behaviour change, and provide emotional support for patients to control their disease and live functional lives. In COPD, the value of self-management education is not yet clear. The first Cochrane review about self-management was published in 2003. It was intended to shed light on the effectiveness of self-management programmes in COPD and the relative efficacy of their constitutive elements. No conclusions about the effectiveness of self-management could be drawn because of the large variation in outcome measures used in the limited number of included studies. This article describes the first update of this review. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess the settings, methods and efficacy of COPD self-management education programmes on health outcomes and use of health care services. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Airways Group trial register, MEDLINE (January 1985 to January 2006), reference lists, and abstracts of medical conferences. SELECTION CRITERIA: Controlled trials (randomised and non-randomised) of self-management education in patients with COPD. Studies focusing mainly on pulmonary rehabilitation and studies without usual care as a control group were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed study quality and extracted data. Investigators were contacted for additional information. MAIN RESULTS: The reviewers included 15 group comparisons drawn from 14 trials. They assessed a broad-spectrum of interventions and health outcomes with different follow-up times. Meta-analyses could often not appropriately be performed because of heterogeneity among studies. The studies showed a significant reduction in the probability of at least one hospital admission among patients receiving self-management education compared to those receiving usual care (OR 0.64; 95% CI (0.47 to 0.89)). This translates into a one year NNT ranging from 10 (6 to 35) for patients with a 51% risk of exacerbation, to an NNT of 24 (16 to 80) for patients with a 13% risk of exacerbation. On the disease specific SGRQ, differences reached statistical significance at the 5% level on the total score (WMD -2.58; 95% CI (-5.14 to -0.02)) and impact domain (WMD -2.83; 95% CI (-5.65 to -0.02)), but these difference did not reach the clinically relevant improvement of 4 points. A small but significant reduction was detected in dyspnoea measured with the BORG-scale (WMD -0.53; 95% CI (-0.96 to -0.10)). No significant effects were found either in number of exacerbations, emergency department visits, lung function, exercise capacity, and days lost from work. Inconclusive results were observed in doctor and nurse visits, on symptoms other than dyspnoea, the use of courses of oral corticosteroids and antibiotics, and the use of rescue medication. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: It is likely that self-management education is associated with a reduction in hospital admissions with no indications for detrimental effects in other outcome parameters. This would in itself already be enough reason for recommending self-management education in COPD. However, because of heterogeneity in interventions, study populations, follow-up time, and outcome measures, data are still insufficient to formulate clear recommendations regarding the form and contents of self-management education programmes in COPD. There is an evident need for more large RCTs with a long-term follow-up, before more conclusions can be drawn.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd002990.pub2

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Achieving the potential of primary care as a platform to effectively deliver SMS and achieve the stated outcomes means overcoming known barriers, such as limited time, skills and confidence among health professionals.

    “achieving the potential of primary care as a platform to effectively deliver SMS and achieve the stated outcomes means overcoming known barriers, such as limited time, skills and confidence among health professionals [31, 147].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Effing, T., Monninkhof, E. E., van der Valk, P. P. D. L. P. M., Zielhuis, G. G., Walters, E. H., van der Palen, J. J., & Zwerink, M.
Affiliations
  • Medisch Spectrum Twente (NL)
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Published
2007-10-17
Issue
4
Pages
CD002990-CD002990
ISSN
1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2114199224
Cited by
536
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 67 · 2013: 70 · 2012: 69
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline@ND (The University of Notre Dame) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
Keywords
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, self-management education, COPD exacerbations, hospitalization, health care utilization, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire, health-related quality of life, patient education, usual care
MeSH terms
Humans, Patient Compliance, Patient Education as Topic, Quality of Life, Self Care, Program Evaluation, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review