Cited by 31Medication Adherence and ComplianceMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsPharmacy and Medical Practices

Creating a synergy effect: A cluster randomized controlled trial testing the effect of a tailored multimedia intervention on patient outcomes

Open access
Linn, Annemiek J., van Dijk, Liset, van Weert, Julia C.M., Gebeyehu, Beniam G., van Bodegraven, Ad. A., Smit, Edith G.·2018·Patient Education and Counseling

Abstract

Objective Improving adherence is a challenge and multiple barriers are likely to explain non-adherence. These barriers differ per patient and over course of the regimen. Hence, personalized interventions tailored to the specific barriers are needed. In a theoretical and evidence-based Tailored Multimedia Intervention, technology (online preparatory assessment, text messaging) was used as an add-on to a tailored counseling session (learned during a communication skills training), with the expectation of synergistic effects.Methods A cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted in six hospitals, eight nurses and 160 chronic patients. Patient satisfaction with communication, beliefs about medication, self-efficacy and medication adherence were assessed at initiation of the treatment and after six months.Results Intervention effects were found for patient satisfaction with nurses' affective communication and self-efficacy at the initiation of treatment. The effect on self-efficacy remained after six months.Conclusion By combining tailored counseling with technology, this intervention resulted in positive changes in important prerequisites of medication adherence.Practical implications Technology can contribute significantly to health care providers' ability to tailor information to the patients' needs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pec.2018.03.017

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Personalizing treatment across multiple fields of healthcare leads to higher treatment adherence and improved satisfaction.

    “Studies across multiple fields of healthcare have shown that personalizing treatment leads to higher treatment adherence as well as improved satisfaction [20–23].”

    From Personalized machine learning guided intervention for optimizing lifestyle behaviors in depression: a pilot study (2026) · cites this paper as [22]

    In Results §3.2 (page unavailable), patients receiving the tailored intervention reported higher satisfaction with nurses’ affective communication at three weeks, but not higher satisfaction on the other measures or at six months. Results §3.4 found no significant increase in medication adherence. The study involved patients with inflammatory bowel disease, so it does not itself establish the claim across multiple healthcare fields. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • All personalized intervention studies use predictive models based on multi-subject data.

    “Yet, of note, all of these personalized intervention studies use predictive models based on multi-subject data.”

    From Personalized machine learning guided intervention for optimizing lifestyle behaviors in depression: a pilot study (2026) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Introduction and Conclusion describe this study as testing a tailored intervention, and the Discussion says its content was tailored to patients’ self-reported adherence barriers. The paper does not say that its intervention used a predictive model based on multi-subject data, or establish that all personalized intervention studies do so. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Linn, A. J., van Dijk, L., van Weert, J. C. M., Gebeyehu, B. G., van Bodegraven, A. A., & Smit, E. G.
Affiliations
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Linn, Annemiek J.
Venue
Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
101
Issue
8
Pages
1419-1426
ISSN
0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2792519785
Cited by
31
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Amsterdam School of Communication Research/ASCoR
  • Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V. and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
Keywords
medication adherence, patient satisfaction, self-efficacy, nurse-patient communication, emotional communication, communication skills training, barriers to adherence, chronic disease patients, text messaging, individualized counseling
MeSH terms
Adult, Counseling, Female, Gastrointestinal Agents, Humans, Inservice Training, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Nurse-Patient Relations, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Patient Education as Topic, Surveys and Questionnaires, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Multimedia, Self Efficacy, Medication Adherence, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review