Cited by 50Diabetes Management and EducationBehavioral Health and InterventionsDiabetes Management and Research

The effect of motivational interviewing on metabolic control and psychosocial variables in individuals diagnosed with diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis

Bilgin, Aylin, Muz, Gamze, Yuce, Gulyeter Erdogan·2022·Patient Education and Counseling

Abstract

Objective The current study aimed to analyze the effects of motivational interviewing (MI) on metabolic and psychosocial variables among individuals with diabetes.Methods Four databases were searched between 2000 and 2021 years. Randomized controlled studies were included. The standardized mean differences were determined. The heterogeneity was analyzed using the I 2 test. The methodological quality was evaluated independently by three researchers.Results This meta-analysis included 16 studies. Glycated hemoglobin, postprandial plasma glucose (PG), systolic blood pressure (BP) significantly decreased after MI. There are no significant effects of MI on fasting PG, body mass index, diastolic BP, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein and triglyceride. MI had an overall significant impact on depression, emotional distress, and self-efficacy. Only four studies had 7 points based on the Modified Jadad Scale. The Egger's test showed no evidence of publication bias.Conclusion MI effectively reduced glycated hemoglobin, postprandial plasma glucose, systolic blood pressure, depressive symptoms, emotional distress, and increased self-efficacy.Practice implications This meta-analysis showed that MI was effective at improving metabolic control and psychosocial variables. MI should be considered a complementary treatment for people diagnosed with diabetes. Future studies should be structured as long-term studies with higher methodological quality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pec.2022.04.008

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bilgin, A., Muz, G., & Yuce, G. E.
Affiliations
  • Hacettepe University (TR)
  • Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University (TR)
Corresponding author
Muz, Gamze
Venue
Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-09
Volume
105
Issue
9
Pages
2806-2823
ISSN
0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4223899635
Cited by
50
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
motivational interviewing, diabetes mellitus, HbA1c, glycemic control, postprandial blood glucose, blood pressure, depression, emotional distress, self-efficacy, psychosocial outcomes, complementary therapy
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Blood Pressure, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Motivational Interviewing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review