Cited by 4Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsElectronic Health Records Systems

The use of asynchronous digital two-way communication between patients and healthcare professionals after hospital discharge: A scoping review

Open access
Jensen, Lili Worre Høpfner, Ghaffari, Arash, Rahbek, Ole, Dinesen, Birthe, Kold, Søren·2024·Patient Education and Counseling

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aimed to identify and map how asynchronous digital two-way communication is used between patients and healthcare professionals after hospital discharge, as well as identify facilitators and barriers to implementation. METHODS: Following the JBI guidance for scoping reviews, we searched seven databases on August 29, 2022. Rayyan was employed for screening the articles, and data were extracted using a predefined and iteratively modified data extraction tool. Facilitators and barriers were systematically categorized according to the domains and constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). RESULTS: Forty articles were included, primarily published between 2012 and 2022 and from the USA. In the majority of articles (77.5 %), asynchronous digital two-way communication was a part of a larger eHealth intervention. Nurses were the healthcare professionals most frequently mentioned as answering patients' messages (35 %) with response times sparsely described, and varying between four hours and three days. Efforts done to implement asynchronous digital two-way communication were only mentioned in 37.5 % of the articles. Facilitators included easy access, convenience, less disturbance, shared expectations for use and communication with professionals familiar to the patient. Barriers involved fear of overlooking health issues, risk of answers being delayed, technical issues and unclear response times. CONCLUSION: There is a gap in the literature between studies that describe the use of asynchronous digital two-way communication after hospital discharge exhaustively and reports on facilitators and barriers to implementation. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This scoping review serves as an overview of the current use of asynchronous digital two-way communication after hospital discharge and sheds light on facilitators and barriers to implementation pertinent to this specific period.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108393

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 79 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jensen, L. W. H., Ghaffari, A., Rahbek, O., Dinesen, B., & Kold, S.
Affiliations
  • Aalborg University Hospital (DK)
  • Aalborg University (DK)
Corresponding author
Jensen, Lili Worre Høpfner
Venue
Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-11
Volume
128
Pages
108393
ISSN
0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401417778
Cited by
4
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Aalborg University Hospital (2021-0019)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
two-way messaging, patient-physician communication, hospital discharge, post-discharge care, digital health interventions, implementation barriers and facilitators, nurse response time
MeSH terms
Communication, Health Personnel, Humans, Patient Discharge, Professional-Patient Relations, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review