Cited by 41Genetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersFace Recognition and PerceptionAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

Rett Syndrome: Recognition of Facial Expression and Its Relation to Scanning Patterns

Djukic, Aleksandra, Rose, Susan A., Jankowski, Jeffery J., Feldman, Judith F.·2014·Pediatric Neurology

Abstract

Background Rett syndrome is a severely disabling neurodevelopmental disorder caused by mutations in the X-linked MECP2 gene. Very little is known about its cognitive phenotype and nothing about recognition of emotional expression, a key factor for social interaction and communication. Using eye tracking technology, a technique uniquely suited for studying cognition in this disorder, we examined this ability here.Methods Rett syndrome female patients (n = 37; 2-31 years) and a typically developing age- and gender-matched comparison group (n =34; 2-30 years) were assessed on recognition of three basic emotions (happy, sad, and fear) using six visual paired-comparison problems. Each problem consisted of a 10-second familiarization, in which two identical faces posing one emotion were presented, followed by a 10-second test, in which the familiar emotion was paired with a novel one posed by the same model. Recognition was inferred from preferential looking to the novel target on test. During familiarization, attention was measured by total looking time, number and/or length of fixations, and gaze dispersion across three key facial features (eyes, nose, and mouth).Results Individuals with Rett syndrome had difficulty recognizing most emotional expressions, unlike the typically developing comparison group. Also, their scanpaths were atypical-less looking, fewer and/or longer fixations, and less time devoted to all facial features (48% versus 72%), particularly the mouth. Significant correlations between looking to critical features and recognition underscored the importance of scanning.Conclusions Our results suggest that individuals with Rett syndrome have difficulty reading emotional expressions and that these problems are linked to atypicalities in scanning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2014.07.022

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Djukic, A., Rose, S. A., Jankowski, J. J., & Feldman, J. F.
Affiliations
Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
Venue
Pediatric Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
51
Issue
5
Pages
650-656
ISSN
0887-8994 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000020286
Cited by
41
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4
FWCI
2.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pediatric Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
International Rett Syndrome Foundation (#8211)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
Rett syndrome, MeCP2, emotion recognition, facial expressions, eye movements, fixation, gaze dispersion, facial features, social cognition, neurodevelopmental disorders, cognitive phenotypes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Association Learning, Attention, Child, Child, Preschool, Eye Movements, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Severity of Illness Index, Rett Syndrome, Case-Control Studies, Recognition, Psychology, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review