Cited by 92Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

The cell cycle as a therapeutic target for Alzheimer's disease

Neve, Rachael L., McPhie, Donna L.·2006·Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most prevalent neurodegenerative disease worldwide. It is a progressive, incurable disease whose predominant clinical manifestation is memory loss, and which always ends in death. The classic neuropathological diagnostic markers for AD are amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles, but our understanding of the role that these features of AD play in the etiology and progression of the disease remains incomplete. Research over the last decade has revealed that cell cycle abnormalities also represent a major neuropathological feature of AD. These abnormalities appear very early in the disease process, prior to the appearance of plaques and tangles. Growing evidence suggests that neuronal cell cycle regulatory failure, leading to apoptosis, may be a significant component of the pathogenesis of AD. A number of signaling pathways with the potential to activate aberrant cell cycle re-entry in AD have been described. The relationships among these signaling cascades, which involve the amyloid precursor protein (APP), cyclin-dependent kinases (cdks), and the cell cycle protein Pin1, have not yet been fully elucidated, but details of the individual pathways are beginning to emerge. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge with respect to specific neuronal signaling events that are thought to underlie cell cycle regulatory failure in AD brain. The elements of these pathways that represent potential new therapeutic targets for AD are describe…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2005.09.005

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neve, R. L., & McPhie, D. L.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Neve, Rachael L.
Venue
Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-07
Volume
111
Issue
1
Pages
99-113
ISSN
0163-7258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021459140
Cited by
92
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmacology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG021185, AG12954, AG021185, R01AG012954)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, cell cycle re-entry, neuronal apoptosis, therapeutic target, amyloid precursor protein, cyclin-dependent kinases, Pin1, signaling pathways, neurodegeneration, amyloid plaques, neurofibrillary tangles
MeSH terms
NIMA-Interacting Peptidylprolyl Isomerase, Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Cell Cycle, Humans, Nerve Degeneration, Signal Transduction, Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor, Cyclin-Dependent Kinases, Peptidylprolyl Isomerase, PPAR gamma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review