Cited by 15Regulation of Appetite and ObesityEating Disorders and BehaviorsDietary Effects on Health

Chronic food restriction and reduced dietary fat: risk factors for bouts of overeating

OGAWA, R, STRADER, A, CLEGG, D, SAKAI, R, SEELEY, R, WOODS, S·2005·Physiology & Behavior

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of chronic food restriction and reduced dietary fat on feeding behavior and body weight. Young female rats were fed ad lib or food restricted on a low-fat (LF) or a fat-free (FF) diet for 4 weeks. Rats then received 24-h free access to 2 diets, the maintenance diet (LF or FF) plus a novel high-fat (HF) diet (24-h intake test). After the test, all the rats were allowed chronic free access to the HF diet until body weight was stable. During the 24-h test, the restricted groups ate significantly more calories than the ad lib groups, and the FF-restricted rats ate significantly more total food, carbohydrate and protein than the LF-restricted rats; there were no differences between the two ad lib groups. During chronic free access to the HF diet, the formerly restricted rats achieved and defended lower body weights than the formerly non-restricted rats. Throughout the experiment, the ad lib groups had more body fat than the restricted groups independent of the dietary subgroup. Hence, a history of chronic food restriction predisposes to consuming more food in acute feeding situations, particularly when dietary fat is reduced, and lowers the level of body weight maintained and defended. Chronic food restriction accompanied by reduced dietary fat may increase risk for bouts of overeating.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.08.028

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rats randomized to extreme caloric deprivation conditions eat significantly more calories during ad lib feeding and show a preference for high-fat foods immediately after the deprivation period relative to non-deprived rats.

    “rats randomized to extreme caloric deprivation conditions (in which they lost 7% - 20% of their body mass) eat significantly more calories during ad lib feeding and show a preference for high-fat foods immediately after the deprivation period relative to non-deprived rats”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
OGAWA, R., STRADER, A., CLEGG, D., SAKAI, R., SEELEY, R., & WOODS, S.
Affiliations
University of Cincinnati (US)
Corresponding author
WOODS, S
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-11-15
Volume
86
Issue
4
Pages
578-585
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013929884
Cited by
15
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Procter and Gamble
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK17844)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
Keywords
chronic food restriction, overeating, feeding behavior, body weight regulation, fat mass, high-fat diet, fat-free diet, low-fat diet, female rats, dietary intake
MeSH terms
Animals, Body Weight, Bulimia, Energy Intake, Dietary Fats, Eating, Feeding Behavior, Female, Risk Factors, Diet, Fat-Restricted, Rats, Long-Evans, Caloric Restriction, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review