Cited by 109Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorEating Disorders and BehaviorsTemporomandibular Joint Disorders

Differences in eating behaviors and masticatory performances by gender and obesity status

Park, Soojin, Shin, Weon-Sun·2015·Physiology & Behavior

Abstract

This study aimed to determine whether there might be differences in masticatory performance and eating behaviors by gender and obesity status. Forty eight (24 males; 24 females) non-obese and pre-obese young adults were matched for age, gender, and dental health. Eating behaviors were assessed using the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ), and chewing performance while eating 152g of boiled rice was measured using electromyography (EMG). Compared with non-obese participants, pre-obese participants had significantly higher levels of disinhibition according to the TFEQ (P<0.05 for males; P<0.01 for females). Microstructures of chewing performance were significantly different by gender but not by obesity status. Males had a greater bite size (P<0.05), greater chewing power (P<0.001) and a faster eating rate (P<0.05) than females. Females habitually chewed more (P<0.05) and had a longer meal duration (P<0.01) than males. Eating rate was positively associated with disinhibition (r=0.490, P<0.05) score in males. Bite size (r=-0.449, P<0.05 for non-obese) and chewing power (r=-0.581, P<0.01 for non-obese and r=-0.446, P<0.05 for pre-obese) were negatively associated with disinhibition score. Results suggest that the effects of gender and, in part, obesity on eating responses may be explained as chewing performance. Therefore, gender-specific interventions and counseling aimed at slowing the rate of ingestion could be promising behavioral treatments for obese persons.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.10.001

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Park, S., & Shin, W.-S.
Affiliations
  • Semyung University (KR)
  • Hanyang University (KR)
Corresponding author
Park, Soojin
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-01
Volume
138
Pages
69-74
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046841659
Cited by
109
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2
FWCI
4.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Royal Society of Chemistry’s Journals, Books and Databases (The Royal Society of Chemistry) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Republic of Korea (2011-2-062)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Keywords
dietary habits, mastication, chewing performance, obesity, pre-obesity, gender differences, disinhibition, eating speed, bite size, meal duration, young adults, electromyography of masticatory muscles
MeSH terms
Adult, Anthropometry, Electromyography, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Mastication, Masticatory Muscles, Obesity, Surveys and Questionnaires, Oryza, Sex Characteristics, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review