The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The sweetness and bitterness of childhood: Insights from basic research on taste preferences
Open accessAbstract
In this article, we review findings from basic, experimental research on children that suggests the liking of sweet and the dislike of bitter tastes reflects children’s basic biology. Children are born preferring sweet tastes, which attract them to mother’s milk and even act as an analgesic. They prefer higher levels of sweet than do adults, with preferences declining to adult levels during middle to late adolescence, which coincides with the cessation of physical growth. The level of sweetness most preferred by children has remained heightened relative to adults for nearly a decade, despite reductions in sugar, both consumed and in the food environment. In spite of these reductions, however, children’s intake of sugar remains higher than that recommended by health organizations worldwide. In contrast to sweet taste, children dislike and reject bitter taste, which protects them from ingesting poisons. Although variation in bitter taste receptor genes such as TAS2R38 accounts for people’s marked differences in perceptions of the same bitter-tasting compounds, basic research revealed that these genotype-phenotype relationships are modified with age, with children of the same genotype being more bitter sensitive than adults and the changeover occurring during mid adolescence. This heightened bitter sensitivity is also evident in the taste of the foods (green vegetables) or medicines (liquid formulations of drugs) they dislike and reject. While bitter taste can be masked or blocked to varying degrees by sugars and salts, their efficacy in modulating bitterness is not only based on the type of bitter ligand but on the person’s age. Children’s heightened preference for sweet and dislike of bitter, though often detrimental in the modern food environment, reflects their basic biology. Increasing knowledge of individual variation in taste due to both age and genetics will shed light on potential strategies to promote healthier eating since chronic diseases derive in large part from poor food choice dictated by taste preferences as well as to contribute to a new era of drug formulations designed especially for the taste palate of children.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Steiner, J. E., Glaser, D., Hawilo, M. E., & Berridge, K. C. (2001) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(00)00051-8 · Cited by 752
Genetic and environmental determinants of bitter perception and sweet preferences.
Mennella, J. A., Pepino, M. Y., & Reed, D. R. (2005) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2004-1582 · Cited by 576 · cited 2×
“That is, the level of sucrose most preferred by children, as measured in the laboratory, was significantly related to children's preferences for sweet-tasting foods, such as cereals [42,43], puddings [44], and beverages [43].”
BackgroundSelf-citationEnergy balance measurement: when something is not better than nothing
Dhurandhar, N. V., Schoeller, D., Brown, A. W., Heymsfield, S. B., Thomas, D., Sørensen, T. I. A., Speakman, J. R., Jeansonne, M., Allison, D. B., & the Energy Balance Measurement Working Group (2015) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/ijo.2014.199 · Cited by 567
Mattes, R. D., & Popkin, B. M. (2009) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.2008.26792 · Cited by 521
Pass the sugar, pass the salt: experience dictates preference.
Sullivan, S. A., & Birch, L. L. (1990) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.26.4.546 · Cited by 450
Longitudinal changes in sweet preferences in humans.
Desor, J. A., & Beauchamp, G. K. (1987) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/0031-9384(87)90166-1 · Cited by 269
Sweet and sour preferences during childhood: role of early experiences.
Liem, D. G., & Mennella, J. A. (2002) · Developmental Psychobiology · doi:10.1002/dev.10067 · Cited by 232
Self-citationChilds, E., & de Wit, H. (2006) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-006-0341-3 · Cited by 219
Oral and postoral determinants of food reward.
SCLAFANI, A. (2004) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.04.031 · Cited by 218
Acceptance of sweet and salty tastes in 2-year-old children.
Beauchamp, G. K., & Moran, M. (1984) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/s0195-6663(84)80002-1 · Cited by 198
Cited by
Medeiros, G. C. B. S. D., Azevedo, K. P. M. D., Garcia, D., Oliveira Segundo, V. H., Mata, Á. N. D. S., Fernandes, A. K. P., Santos, R. P. D., Trindade, D. D. B. D. B., Moreno, I. M., Guillén Martínez, D., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph191710522 · Cited by 94
Taste the feeling or feel the tasting: Tactile exposure to food texture promotes food acceptance
Nederkoorn, C., Theiβen, J., Tummers, M., & Roefs, A. (2018) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2017.09.010 · Cited by 60
Physiological integration of taste and metabolism
Egan, J. M. (2024) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra2304578 · Cited by 40
Hahnraths, M. T. H., Jansen, J. P. M., Winkens, B., & van Schayck, O. C. P. (2022) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu14204259 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Mennella, J. A., & Bobowski, N. K.
- Venue
- Physiology & Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-12
- Volume
- 152
- Issue
- Pt B
- Pages
- 502-507
- ISSN
- 0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1734011921
- Cited by
- 399
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 13.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The sweetness and bitterness of childhood: Insights from basic research on taste preferences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.05.015
- The paper
- Mennella, J. A., & Bobowski, N. K. (2015). The sweetness and bitterness of childhood: Insights from basic research on taste preferences. Physiology & Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.05.015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.