The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
1/R gravity and scalar-tensor gravity
Open accessAbstract
We point out that extended gravity theories, the Lagrangian of which is an arbitrary function of scalar curvature R, are equivalent to a class of the scalar-tensor theories of gravity. The corresponding gravity theory is ω=0 Brans–Dicke gravity with a potential for the Brans–Dicke scalar field, which is not compatible with solar system experiments if the field is very light: the case when such modifications become important recently.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new type of isotropic cosmological models without singularity
Starobinsky, A. A. (1980) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90670-x · Cited by 7,677
Cosmological scaling solutions of nonminimally coupled scalar fields
Uzan, J.-P. (1999) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.59.123510 · Cited by 468
Cited by
Beyond the cosmological standard model
Joyce, A., Jain, B., Khoury, J., & Trodden, M. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.12.002 · Cited by 1,231
Cosmology and Fundamental Physics with the Euclid Satellite
The Euclid Theory Working Group, Amendola, L., Appleby, S., Bacon, D., Baker, T., Baldi, M., Bartolo, N., Blanchard, A., Bonvin, C., Borgani, S., et al. (2013) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2013-6 · Cited by 899
The effective field theory of dark energy
Gubitosi, G., Piazza, F., & Vernizzi, F. (2013) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/02/032 · Cited by 510
Dark Energy Versus Modified Gravity
Joyce, A., Lombriser, L., & Schmidt, F. (2016) · Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-102115-044553 · Cited by 463
Burrage, C., & Sakstein, J. (2018) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-018-0011-x · Cited by 366
Nonlinear evolution of the matter power spectrum in modified theories of gravity
Koyama, K., Taruya, A., & Hiramatsu, T. (2009) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.123512 · Cited by 141
Giannantonio, T., Martinelli, M., Silvestri, A., & Melchiorri, A. (2010) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2010/04/030 · Cited by 85
A new perspective on DGP gravity
Gregory, R., Kaloper, N., Myers, R. C., & Padilla, A. (2007) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/10/069 · Cited by 77
Cosmological constraints on a classical limit of quantum gravity
Easson, D. A., Schuller, F. P., Trodden, M., & Wohlfarth, M. N. R. (2005) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.72.043504 · Cited by 25
A minimal set of invariants as a systematic approach to higher order gravity models
Ishak, M., & Moldenhauer, J. (2009) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2009/01/024 · Cited by 16
Moldenhauer, J., & Ishak, M. (2009) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2009/12/020 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Chiba, T.
- Venue
- Physics Letters B
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 575
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 1-3
- ISSN
- 0370-2693 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2041664594
- Cited by
- 678
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
