The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neutron star observations: Prognosis for equation of state constraints
Open accessAbstract
Abstract We investigate how current and proposed observations of neutron stars can lead to an understanding of the state of their interiors and the key unknowns: the typical neutron star radius and the neutron star maximum mass. We consider observations made not only with photons, ranging from radio waves to X-rays, but also those involving neutrinos and gravity waves. We detail how precision determinations of structural properties would lead to significant restrictions on the poorly understood equation of state near and beyond the equilibrium density of nuclear matter. To begin, a theoretical analysis of neutron star structure, including general relativistic limits to mass, compactness, and spin rates is made. A review is the made of recent observations such as pulsar timing (which leads to mass, spin period, glitch and moment of inertia estimates), optical and X-ray observations of cooling neutron stars (which lead to estimates of core temperatures and ages and inferences about the internal composition), and X-ray observations of accreting and bursting sources (which shed light on both the crustal properties and internal composition). Next, we discuss neutrino emission from proto-neutron stars and how neutrino observations of a supernova, from both current and planned detectors, might impact our knowledge of the interiors, mass and radii of neutron stars. We also explore the question of how superstrong magnetic fields could affect the equation of state and neutron star structure. This is followed by a look at binary mergers involving neutron stars and how the detection of gravity waves could unambiguously distinguish normal neutron stars from self-bound strange quark matter stars.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Witten, E. (1984) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.30.272 · Cited by 3,452
Cited by
Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics
Will, C. M. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781316338612 · Cited by 3,637
Color superconductivity in dense quark matter
Alford, M. G., Schmitt, A., Rajagopal, K., & Schäfer, T. (2008) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.1455 · Cited by 1,443
Tidal Love Numbers of Neutron Stars
Hinderer, T. (2008) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/533487 · Cited by 1,306
Hinderer, T., Lackey, B. D., Lang, R. N., & Read, J. S. (2010) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.81.123016 · Cited by 1,048
Testing the nature of dark compact objects: a status report
Cardoso, V., & Pani, P. (2019) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-019-0020-4 · Cited by 956
The Nuclear Equation of State and Neutron Star Masses
Lattimer, J. M. (2012) · Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-102711-095018 · Cited by 937
Self-citationFormation of Double Neutron Star Systems
Tauris, T. M., Kramer, M., Freire, P. C. C., Wex, N., Janka, H.-T., Langer, N., Podsiadlowski, P., Bozzo, E., Chaty, S., Kruckow, M. U., et al. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa7e89 · Cited by 688
Binary and Millisecond Pulsars
Lorimer, D. R. (2008) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2008-8 · Cited by 616
Yagi, K., & Yunes, N. (2013) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.023009 · Cited by 522
Testing general relativity in cosmology
Ishak, M. (2019) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-018-0017-4 · Cited by 449
Magnetars: the physics behind observations. A review
Turolla, R., Zane, S., & Watts, A. L. (2015) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/78/11/116901 · Cited by 447
Coalescence of Black Hole-Neutron Star Binaries
Shibata, M., & Taniguchi, K. (2011) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2011-6 · Cited by 440
Post-1-Newtonian tidal effects in the gravitational waveform from binary inspirals
Vines, J., Flanagan, É. É., & Hinderer, T. (2011) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.83.084051 · Cited by 340
THE DISTANCE, MASS, AND RADIUS OF THE NEUTRON STAR IN 4U 1608–52
Güver, T., Özel, F., Cabrera-Lavers, A., & Wroblewski, P. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/712/2/964 · Cited by 321
THE MASS AND RADIUS OF THE NEUTRON STAR IN EXO 1745–248
Özel, F., Güver, T., & Psaltis, D. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/693/2/1775 · Cited by 306
Born–Infeld inspired modifications of gravity
Beltrán Jiménez, J., Heisenberg, L., Olmo, G. J., & Rubiera-Garcia, D. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.11.001 · Cited by 292
A NICER View of the Nearest and Brightest Millisecond Pulsar: PSR J0437–4715
Choudhury, D., Salmi, T., Vinciguerra, S., Riley, T. E., Kini, Y., Watts, A. L., Dorsman, B., Bogdanov, S., Guillot, S., Ray, P. S., et al. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad5a6f · Cited by 291
Self-citationNeutron stars and the nuclear equation of state
Burgio, G. F., Schulze, H.-J., Vidaña, I., & Wei, J.-B. (2021) · Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103879 · Cited by 281
QUARK MATTER IN MASSIVE COMPACT STARS
Weissenborn, S., Sagert, I., Pagliara, G., Hempel, M., & Schaffner-Bielich, J. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/2041-8205/740/1/l14 · Cited by 271
Stellar structure models in modified theories of gravity: Lessons and challenges
Olmo, G. J., Rubiera-Garcia, D., & Wojnar, A. (2020) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.07.001 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- LATTIMER, J., & PRAKASH, M.
- Venue
- Physics Reports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 442
- Issue
- 1-6
- Pages
- 109-165
- ISSN
- 0370-1573 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2007709299
- Cited by
- 1,399
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 41.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.