The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantum spin squeezing
Open accessAbstract
This paper reviews quantum spin squeezing, which characterizes the sensitivity of a state with respect to SU(2) rotations, and is significant for both entanglement detection and high-precision metrology. We first present various definitions of spin squeezing parameters, explain their origin and properties for typical states, and then discuss spin-squeezed states produced with nonlinear twisting Hamiltonians. Afterward, we explain pairwise correlations and entanglement in spin-squeezed states, as well as the relations between spin squeezing and quantum Fisher information, where the latter plays a central role in quantum metrology. We also review the applications of spin squeezing for detecting quantum chaos and quantum phase transitions, as well as the influence of decoherence on spin squeezing. Finally, we review several experimental realizations of spin squeezing, as well as their corresponding theoretical backgrounds, including: producing spin-squeezed states via particle collisions in Bose-Einstein condensates, transferring photon squeezing to atomic ensembles, and generating spin squeezing via quantum nondemolition measurements. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895
Entanglement of Formation of an Arbitrary State of Two Qubits
Wootters, W. K. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.2245 · Cited by 8,290
The Theory of Open Quantum Systems
Breuer, H.-P., & Petruccione, F. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199213900.001.0001 · Cited by 5,938
Quantum phase transition from a superfluid to a Mott insulator in a gas of ultracold atoms
Greiner, M., Mandel, O., Esslinger, T., Hänsch, T. W., & Bloch, I. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415039a · Cited by 5,935
Entanglement in many-body systems
Amico, L., Fazio, R., Osterloh, A., & Vedral, V. (2008) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.517 · Cited by 3,745
Quantum-mechanical noise in an interferometer
Caves, C. M. (1981) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.23.1693 · Cited by 3,202
Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states
Braunstein, S. L., & Caves, C. M. (1994) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.72.3439 · Cited by 3,176
Probabilistic and Statistical Aspects of Quantum Theory
Holevo, A. (2011) · doi:10.1007/978-88-7642-378-9 · Cited by 2,582
Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., & Maccone, L. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.010401 · Cited by 2,440
Peres-Horodecki Separability Criterion for Continuous Variable Systems
Simon, R. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.2726 · Cited by 2,245
Inseparability Criterion for Continuous Variable Systems
Duan, L.-M., Giedke, G., Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.2722 · Cited by 2,064
Atomic physics and quantum optics using superconducting circuits
You, J. Q., & Nori, F. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10122 · Cited by 1,311
Self-citationImprovement of Frequency Standards with Quantum Entanglement
Huelga, S. F., Macchiavello, C., Pellizzari, T., Ekert, A. K., Plenio, M. B., & Cirac, J. I. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.79.3865 · Cited by 999
Entanglement, Nonlinear Dynamics, and the Heisenberg Limit
Pezzé, L., & Smerzi, A. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.100401 · Cited by 880
Buluta, I., & Nori, F. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1177838 · Cited by 876
Self-citationFIDELITY APPROACH TO QUANTUM PHASE TRANSITIONS
GU, S.-J. (2010) · International Journal of Modern Physics B · doi:10.1142/s0217979210056335 · Cited by 663
Quantum projection noise: Population fluctuations in two-level systems
Itano, W. M., Bergquist, J. C., Bollinger, J. J., Gilligan, J. M., Heinzen, D. J., Moore, F. L., Raizen, M. G., & Wineland, D. J. (1993) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.47.3554 · Cited by 613
Quantum non-demolition detection of single microwave photons in a circuit
Johnson, B. R., Reed, M. D., Houck, A. A., Schuster, D. I., Bishop, L. S., Ginossar, E., Gambetta, J. M., DiCarlo, L., Frunzio, L., Girvin, S. M., et al. (2010) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1710 · Cited by 309
Cited by
Quantum metrology from a quantum information science perspective
Tóth, G., & Apellaniz, I. (2014) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/47/42/424006 · Cited by 862
Generation of multicomponent atomic Schrödinger cat states of up to 20 qubits
Song, C., Xu, K., Li, H., Zhang, Y.-R., Zhang, X., Liu, W., Guo, Q., Wang, Z., Ren, W., Hao, J., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aay0600 · Cited by 402
Compatibility in multiparameter quantum metrology
Ragy, S., Jarzyna, M., & Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.94.052108 · Cited by 305
Quantum feedback: Theory, experiments, and applications
Zhang, J., Liu, Y.-X., Wu, R.-B., Jacobs, K., & Nori, F. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.02.003 · Cited by 272
Self-citationFrérot, I., & Roscilde, T. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.020402 · Cited by 149
Metadata
- Authors
- Ma, J., Wang, X., Sun, C. P., & Nori, F.
- Venue
- Physics Reports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 509
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 89-165
- ISSN
- 0370-1573 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2109809398
- Cited by
- 846
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 30.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.