The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scale invariance vs conformal invariance
Abstract
In this review article, we discuss the distinction and possible equivalence between scale invariance and conformal invariance in relativistic quantum field theories. Under some technical assumptions, we can prove that scale invariant quantum field theories in d=2 space–time dimensions necessarily possess the enhanced conformal symmetry. The use of the conformal symmetry is well appreciated in the literature, but the fact that all the scale invariant phenomena in d=2 space–time dimensions enjoy the conformal property relies on the deep structure of the renormalization group. The outstanding question is whether this feature is specific to d=2 space–time dimensions or it holds in higher dimensions, too. As of January 2014, our consensus is that there is no known example of scale invariant but non-conformal field theories in d=4 space–time dimensions under the assumptions of (1) unitarity, (2) Poincare invariance (causality), (3) discrete spectrum in scaling dimensions, (4) existence of scale current and (5) unbroken scale invariance in the vacuum. We have a perturbative proof of the enhancement of conformal invariance from scale invariance based on the higher dimensional analogue of Zamolodchikov’s cc-theorem, but the non-perturbative proof is yet to come. As a reference we have tried to collect as many interesting examples of scale invariance in relativistic quantum field theories as possible in this article. We give a complementary holographic argument based on the energy-condition of the gravitational system and the space–time diffeomorphism in order to support the claim of the symmetry enhancement. We believe that the possible enhancement of conformal invariance from scale invariance reveals the sublime nature of the renormalization group and space–time with holography. This review is based on a lecture note on scale invariance vs conformal invariance, on which the author gave lectures at Taiwan Central University for the 5th Taiwan School on Strings and Fields.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895
The large $N$ limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity
Maldacena, J. (1998) · Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics · doi:10.4310/atmp.1998.v2.n2.a1 · Cited by 14,524
Anti de Sitter space and holography
Witten, E. (1998) · Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics · doi:10.4310/atmp.1998.v2.n2.a2 · Cited by 13,070
Gauge theory correlators from non-critical string theory
Gubser, S. S., Klebanov, I. R., & Polyakov, A. M. (1998) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(98)00377-3 · Cited by 9,307
Gauge Theory Correlators from Non-Critical String Theory
Gubser, S. S., Klebanov, I. R., & Polyakov, A. M. (1998) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/9802109 · Cited by 9,307
Ryu, S., & Takayanagi, T. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.181602 · Cited by 4,302
Susskind, L. (1994) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/9409089 · Cited by 4,085
Entanglement Entropy and Quantum Field Theory
Calabrese, P., & Cardy, J. (2004) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/0405152 · Cited by 3,275
Brown, J. D., & Henneaux, M. (1986) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01211590 · Cited by 2,605
Operator content of two-dimensional conformally invariant theories
Cardy, J. L. (1986) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90552-3 · Cited by 1,955
Stability in gauged extended supergravity
Breitenlohner, P., & Freedman, D. Z. (1982) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/0003-4916(82)90116-6 · Cited by 1,707
Twenty years of the Weyl anomaly
Duff, M. J. (1994) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/11/6/004 · Cited by 785
Thermal stress tensors in static Einstein spaces
Page, D. N. (1982) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.25.1499 · Cited by 291
c-theorem and spectral representation
Cappelli, A., Friedan, D., & Latorre, J. (1991) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(91)90102-4 · Cited by 231
Superluminal Travel Requires Negative Energies
Olum, K. D. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.3567 · Cited by 126
Cited by
The conformal bootstrap: Theory, numerical techniques, and applications
Poland, D., Rychkov, S., & Vichi, A. (2019) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.91.015002 · Cited by 760
Recent advances in percolation theory and its applications
Saberi, A. A. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2015.03.003 · Cited by 438
Metadata
- Authors
- Nakayama, Y.
- Venue
- Physics Reports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-03
- Volume
- 569
- Pages
- 1-93
- ISSN
- 0370-1573 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2157928441
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 13.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.