Cited by 94S100 Proteins and AnnexinsPlant Stress Responses and TolerancePlant Molecular Biology Research

Structure, function and membrane interactions of plant annexins: An update

Konopka-Postupolska, Dorota, Clark, Greg, Hofmann, Andreas·2011·Plant Science

Abstract

Knowledge accumulated over the past 15 years on plant annexins clearly indicates that this disparate group of proteins builds on the common annexin function of membrane association, but possesses divergent molecular mechanisms. Functionally, the current literature agrees on a key role of plant annexins in stress response processes such as wound healing and drought tolerance. This is contrasted by only few established details of the molecular level mechanisms that are driving these activities. In this review, we appraise the current knowledge of plant annexin molecular, functional and structural properties with a special emphasis on topics of less coverage in recent past overviews. In particular, plant annexin post-translational modification, roles in polar growth and membrane stabilisation processes are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.05.013

Cites

149 of 149 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The N-terminal domain of vertebrate annexins is known to be modified by phosphorylation, transglutamination, myristoylation, and S-glutathionylation.

    “The N-terminal domain of vertebrate annexins is known to be modified by phosphorylation, transglutamination, myristoylation, and S-glutathionylation (20).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 153 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Konopka-Postupolska, D., Clark, G., & Hofmann, A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Griffith University (AU)
Corresponding author
Hofmann, Andreas
Venue
Plant Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-09
Volume
181
Issue
3
Pages
230-241
ISSN
0168-9452 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1996506183
Cited by
94
References
153
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Plant Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Education and Science
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › S100 Proteins and Annexins
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
Keywords
membrane association, post-translational modification, polar growth, membrane stabilization, stress response, wound healing, drought tolerance, protein structure-function relationship
MeSH terms
Cell Membrane, Molecular Conformation, Phosphorylation, Plant Proteins, Plants, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Structure-Activity Relationship, Annexins, Genes, Plant, Oxidative Stress, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, Plant Physiological Phenomena, Plant Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review