The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nickel; whether toxic or essential for plants and environment - A review
Open accessAbstract
Nickel (Ni) is becoming a toxic pollutant in agricultural environments. Due to its diverse uses from a range of common household items to industrial applications, it is essential to examine Ni bioavailability in soil and plants. Ni occurs in the environment (soil, water and air) in very small concentrations and eventually taken up by plants through roots once it becomes available in soil. It is an essential nutrient for normal plant growth and development and required for the activation of several enzymes such as urease, and glyoxalase-I. Ni plays important roles in a wide range of physiological processes including seed germination, vegetative and reproductive growth, photosynthesis as well as in nitrogen metabolism. Therefore, plants cannot endure their life cycle without adequate Ni supply. However, excessive Ni concentration can lead to induce ROS production affecting numerous physiological and biochemical processes such as photosynthesis, transpiration, as well as mineral nutrition and causes phytotoxicity in plants. ROS production intensifies the disintegration of plasma membranes and deactivates functioning of vital enzymes through lipid peroxidation. This review article explores the essential roles of Ni in the life cycle of plant as well as its toxic effects in details. In conclusion, we have proposed different viable approaches for remediation of Ni-contaminated soils.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metals, Toxicity and Oxidative Stress
Valko, M., Morris, H., & Cronin, M. (2005) · Current Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/0929867053764635 · Cited by 5,018
Krämer, U., Talke, I. N., & Hanikenne, M. (2007) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2007.04.010 · Cited by 583
Sebertia acuminata : A Hyperaccumulator of Nickel from New Caledonia
Jaffré, T., Brooks, R. R., Lee, J., & Reeves, R. D. (1976) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.193.4253.579 · Cited by 410
Zhao, F., Hamon, R. E., Lombi, E., McLaughlin, M. J., & McGrath, S. P. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jexbot/53.368.535 · Cited by 385
Heavy Metals in Crop Plants: Transport and Redistribution Processes on the Whole Plant Level
Page, V., & Feller, U. (2015) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy5030447 · Cited by 307
Robinson, B. H., Chiarucci, A., Brooks, R. R., Petit, D., Kirkman, J. H., Gregg, P. E. H., & De Dominicis, V. (1997) · Journal of Geochemical Exploration · doi:10.1016/s0375-6742(97)00010-1 · Cited by 234
Heavy metal tolerance and accumulation of Cd, Cr and Ni by Cannabis sativa L.
Citterio, S., Santagostino, A., Fumagalli, P., Prato, N., Ranalli, P., & Sgorbati, S. (2003) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1026113905129 · Cited by 189
Cited by
Rhizosphere microbial communities and heavy metals
Barra Caracciolo, A., & Terenzi, V. (2021) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms9071462 · Cited by 234
Microbial mediated remediation of heavy metals toxicity: mechanisms and future prospects
Tang, H., Xiang, G., Xiao, W., Yang, Z., & Zhao, B. (2024) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1420408 · Cited by 178
Ecological Impacts and Potential Hazards of Nickel on Soil Microbes, Plants, and Human Health
Rizwan, M., Usman, K., & Alsafran, M. (2024) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.142028 · Cited by 113
Switchgrass and Giant Reed Energy Potential when Cultivated in Heavy Metals Contaminated Soils
Gomes, L., Costa, J., Moreira, J., Cumbane, B., Abias, M., Santos, F., Zanetti, F., Monti, A., & Fernando, A. L. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15155538 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Shahzad, B., Tanveer, M., Rehman, A., Cheema, S. A., Fahad, S., Rehman, S., & Sharma, A.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 132
- Pages
- 641-651
- ISSN
- 0981-9428 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2897984002
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 8.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.