Cited by 15Fatty Acid Research and HealthBirth, Development, and HealthHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Docosahexaenoic acid supplementation (DHA) and the return on investment for pregnancy outcomes

Open access
Shireman, T.I., Kerling, E.H., Gajewski, B.J., Colombo, J., Carlson, S.E.·2016·Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids

Abstract

The Kansas University DHA Outcomes Study (KUDOS) found a significant reduction in early preterm births with a supplement of 600mg DHA per day compared to placebo. The objective of this analysis was to determine if hospital costs differed between groups. We applied a post-hoc cost analysis of the delivery hospitalization and all hospitalizations in the following year to 197 mother-infant dyads who delivered at Kansas University Hospital. Hospital cost saving of DHA supplementation amounted to $1678 per infant. Even after adjusting for the estimated cost of providing 600mg/d DHA for 26 weeks ($166.48) and a slightly higher maternal care cost ($26) in the DHA group, the net saving per dyad was $1484. Extrapolating this to the nearly 4 million US deliveries per year suggests universal supplementation with 600mg/d during the last 2 trimesters of pregnancy could save the US health care system up to USD 6 billion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.plefa.2016.05.008

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DHA supplementation during pregnancy was estimated to be both medically and socio-economically relevant through its ability to reduce the incidence of premature birth.

    “DHA supplementation during pregnancy was estimated to be both medically and socio-economically relevant through its ability to reduce the incidence of premature birth [132].”
  • Shireman and colleagues demonstrated, after applying a post-hoc cost analysis of delivery hospitalizations and all hospitalizations in the year following deliveries at Kansas University Hospital, that hospital cost savings related to DHA supplementation were estimated to be USD 1,678 per infant.

    “Shireman and colleagues [132] demonstrated, after applying a post-hoc cost analysis of delivery hospitalizations and all hospitalizations in the year following deliveries at the Kansas University Hospital, that hospital cost savings related to DHA supplementation were estimated to be USD 1,678 per infant.”
  • Even after adjusting for the estimated cost of providing 600 mg/day of supplemental DHA for 26 weeks (USD 166.48) and a slightly higher maternal care cost (USD 26) in the DHA group, the net saving per mother-child pair was USD 1,484.

    “Even after adjusting for the estimated cost of providing 600 mg/day of supplemental DHA for 26 weeks (USD 166.48) and a slightly higher maternal care cost (USD 26) in the DHA group, the net saving per mother-child pair was USD 1,484.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [2]B. Institute of Medicine Committee on Understanding Premature, O. Assuring Healthy, The National Academies Collection Behrman RE Butler AS Reports funded by National Institutes of Health Preterm Birth: Causes, Consequences, and Prevention 2007 National Academies Press (US) National Academy of Sciences. Washington (DC) 20669423

Authors
Shireman, T. I., Kerling, E. H., Gajewski, B. J., Colombo, J., & Carlson, S. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
  • University of Kansas (US)
Corresponding author
Carlson, S.E.
Venue
Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-08
Volume
111
Pages
8-10
ISSN
0952-3278 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2379204335
Cited by
15
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Prostaglandins Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD047315)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
docosahexaenoic acid, omega-3 supplementation, pregnancy outcomes, preterm birth, hospital costs, cost reduction, healthcare cost analysis
MeSH terms
Docosahexaenoic Acids, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Pregnancy Trimester, Second, Pregnancy Trimester, Third, Cost Savings, Health Care Costs, Dietary Supplements, Maternal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Premature Birth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review