The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Current status of recycling of fibre reinforced polymers: Review of technologies, reuse and resulting properties
Open accessAbstract
A complete review of the different techniques that have been developed to recycle fibre reinforced polymers is presented. The review also focuses on the reuse of valuable products recovered by different techniques, in particular the way that fibres have been reincorporated into new materials or applications and the main technological issues encountered. Recycled glass fibres can replace small amounts of virgin fibres in products but not at high enough concentrations to make their recycling economically and environmentally viable, if for example, thermolysis or solvolysis is used. Reclaimed carbon fibres from high-technology applications cannot be reincorporated in the same applications from which they were recovered, so new appropriate applications have to be developed in order to reuse the fibres. Materials incorporating recycled fibres exhibit specific mechanical properties because of the particular characteristics imparted by the fibres. The development of specific standards is therefore necessary, as well as efforts in the development of solutions that enable reusers to benefit from their reinforcement potential. The recovery and reuse of valuable products from resins are also considered, but also the development of recyclable thermoset resins. Finally, the economic and environmental aspects of recycling composite materials, based on Life Cycle Assessment, are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Roles of Water for Chemical Reactions in High-Temperature Water
Akiya, N., & Savage, P. E. (2002) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr000668w · Cited by 1,581
Corrosion in high-temperature and supercritical water and aqueous solutions: a review
Kritzer, P. (2004) · The Journal of Supercritical Fluids · doi:10.1016/s0896-8446(03)00031-7 · Cited by 660
Cited by
Plastic Waste: Challenges and Opportunities to Mitigate Pollution and Effective Management
Kibria, M. G., Masuk, N. I., Safayet, R., Nguyen, H. Q., & Mourshed, M. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research · doi:10.1007/s41742-023-00507-z · Cited by 884
Karuppannan Gopalraj, S., & Kärki, T. (2020) · SN Applied Sciences · doi:10.1007/s42452-020-2195-4 · Cited by 452
Readily recyclable carbon fiber reinforced composites based on degradable thermosets: a review
Wang, B., Ma, S., Yan, S., & Zhu, J. (2019) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c9gc01760g · Cited by 246
Tailoring Hydrocarbon Polymers and All‐Hydrocarbon Composites for Circular Economy
Hees, T., Zhong, F., Stürzel, M., & Mülhaupt, R. (2019) · Macromolecular Rapid Communications · doi:10.1002/marc.201800608 · Cited by 100
Metadata
- Authors
- Oliveux, G., Dandy, L. O., & Leeke, G. A.
- Venue
- Progress in Materials Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-07
- Volume
- 72
- Pages
- 61-99
- ISSN
- 0079-6425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008083565
- Cited by
- 1,287
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 51.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current status of recycling of fibre reinforced polymers: Review of technologies, reuse and resulting properties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.01.004
- The paper
- Oliveux, G., Dandy, L. O., & Leeke, G. A. (2015). Current status of recycling of fibre reinforced polymers: Review of technologies, reuse and resulting properties. Progress in Materials Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.01.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.