Cited by 89Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderGinkgo biloba and Cashew ApplicationsNatural Compound Pharmacology Studies

Ginkgo biloba for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in children and adolescents: A double blind, randomized controlled trial

Salehi, Bahman, Imani, Reza, Mohammadi, Mohammad Reza, Fallah, Jalil, Mohammadi, Mohammad, Ghanizadeh, Ahmad, Tasviechi, Ali Akbar, Vossoughi, Ardalan +2 more·2010·Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Although stimulants are highly effective in controlling the symptoms of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), some children will not respond to, or are intolerant of stimulants. Thus, the desire for safe and effective nonstimulant medications has risen during the past several years. Ginkgo biloba has been suggested in the treatment of dementia and memory impairment. We hypothesized that G.biloba would be beneficial for treatment of ADHD, and this could be evaluated in a double blind, randomized, parallel group comparison of G.biloba (Ginko T.D. Tolidaru, Iran) and methylphenidate.Methods Fifty outpatients (39 boys and 11 girls) with a DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of ADHD were study population of this trial. Subjects were recruited from an outpatient child and adolescent clinic for a 6 week double blind, randomized clinical trial. All study subjects were randomly assigned to receive treatment using tablet of Ginko T.D. at a dose of 80-120 mg/day depending on weight (80 mg/day for <30 kg and 120 mg/day for >30 kg) (group 1) or methylphenidate at a dose of 20-30 mg/day depending on weight (20 mg/day for <30 kg and 30 mg/day for >30 kg (group 2) for a 6 week double blind, randomized clinical trial. The principal measure of outcome was the Teacher and Parent ADHD Rating Scale- IV. Patients were assessed at baseline and at 21 and 42 days after the medication started.Results Significant differences were observed between the two groups on the Parent and Teacher Rating Scale scores. The changes at the endpoint compared to baseline were: -6.52+/-11.43 (mean+/-S.D.) and -15.92+/-11.44 (mean+/-S.D.) for Ginko T.D. and methyphenidate, respectively for Parent ADHD Rating Scale. The changes at the endpoint compared to baseline were: -0.84+/-6.79 (mean+/-S.D.) and -14.04+/-8.67 (mean+/-S.D.) for Ginko T.D. and methyphenidate, respectively for Teacher ADHD Rating Scale. The difference between the Ginko T.D. and methylphenidate groups in the frequency of side effects was not significant except for decreased appetite, headache and insomnia that were observed more frequently in the methylphenidate group.Conclusion The results of this study suggest that administration of G.biloba was less effective than methylphenidate in the treatment of ADHD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2009.09.026

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gingko biloba failed in head-to-head comparison with methylphenidate.

    “Positive results were claimed for gingko biloba [106], but this failed in head-to-head comparison with methylphenidate [107].”

    From Advances in understanding and treating ADHD (2011) · cites this paper as [107]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salehi, B., Imani, R., Mohammadi, M. R., Fallah, J., Mohammadi, M., Ghanizadeh, A., Tasviechi, A. A., Vossoughi, A., Rezazadeh, S.-A., & Akhondzadeh, S.
Affiliations
  • Arak University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Roozbeh Hospital (IR)
  • Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Akhondzadeh, Shahin
Venue
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-02
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
76-80
ISSN
0278-5846 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017287966
Cited by
89
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Ginkgo biloba and Cashew Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Natural Compound Pharmacology Studies
Keywords
Ginkgo biloba, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, methylphenidate, non-stimulant medication, children and adolescents, ADHD Rating Scale-IV, adverse effects, treatment efficacy, herbal medicine, parent and teacher ratings
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Male, Phytotherapy, Methylphenidate, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Treatment Outcome, Ginkgo biloba, Plant Preparations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review