Cited by 32

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Banal materiality and the idea of sovereignty: The migration funnel effect and the policing of the U.S.-Mexico border, 2000–2016

Soto, Gabriella·2018·Political Geography

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.08.003

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Abarca, 2018, Sovereign intimacies: The lives of documents within US state-noncitizen relationships, American Ethnologist, 45, 7, 10.1111/amet.12595 · DOI
  2. Anderson, 2008, Symposium on border crossing deaths: Introduction, Journal of Forensic Sciences, 53, 6, 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00608.x · DOI
  3. Coleman, 2016, The disappearing state and the quasi-event of immigration control, Antipode, 48, 524, 10.1111/anti.12209 · DOI
  4. Dawdy, 2010, Clockpunk anthropology and the ruins of modernity, Current Anthropology, 51, 761, 10.1086/657626 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Dawdy, 2015, Profane archaeology and the existential dialectics of the city, Journal of Social Archaeology, 16, 1
  6. De León, 2012, “Better to be hot than caught”: Excavating the conflicting roles of migrant material culture, American Anthropologist, 114, 477, 10.1111/j.1548-1433.2012.01447.x · DOI
  7. Doty, 2011, Bare life: Border-crossing deaths and spaces of moral alibi, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29, 599, 10.1068/d3110 · DOI
  8. Giordano, 2017, Migrant deaths at the Arizona-Mexico border: Spatial trends of a mass disaster, Forensic Science International, 280, 200, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.07.031 · DOI
  9. Gokee, 2014, Sites of contention: Archaeological classification and political discourse in the US-Mexico borderlands, Journal of Contemporary Archaeology, 1, 133, 10.1558/jca.v1i1.133 · DOI
  10. González-Ruibal, 2006, The past is tomorrow. Towards an archaeology of the vanishing present, Norwegian Archaeological Review, 39, 110, 10.1080/00293650601030073 · DOI
  11. Gordillo, 2011, Ships stranded in the forest: Debris of progress on a phantom river, Current Anthropology, 52, 141, 10.1086/658909 · DOI
  12. Graeber, 2012, Dead zones of the imagination: On violence, bureaucracy, and interpretative labor, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 2, 105, 10.14318/hau2.2.007 · DOI
  13. Hartnett, 2013, The archaeology of illegal and illicit economies, Annual Review of Anthropology, 42, 37, 10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155452 · DOI
  14. Harvey, 2012, The enchantments of infrastructure, Mobilities, 7, 521, 10.1080/17450101.2012.718935 · DOI
  15. Jansson, A. (forthcoming). Trail and road attributes and formation processes. In S. Hart, T. J. Ferguson, & M. Hopkins (Eds.), O’odham trails on the Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument: The western and central travel corridors. Tucson: University of Arizona, School of Anthropology.
  16. Jusionyte, 2018, Called to “ankle alley”: Tactical infrastructure, migrant injuries, and emergency medical services on the US–Mexico border, American Anthropologist, 120, 89, 10.1111/aman.12967 · DOI
  17. Lutz, 2006, Empire is in the details, American Ethnologist, 33, 593, 10.1525/ae.2006.33.4.593 · DOI
  18. Madsen, 2007, Local impacts of the balloon effect of border law enforcement, Geopolitics, 12, 280, 10.1080/14650040601168990 · DOI
  19. Martínez, 2016, Coyote use in a era of heightened border enforcement: New evidence from the Arizona-Sonora border, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42, 103, 10.1080/1369183X.2015.1076720 · DOI
  20. Meehan, 2013, Political geographies of the object, Political Geography, 33, 1, 10.1016/j.polgeo.2012.11.002 · DOI
  21. Mountz, 2003, Human smuggling, the transnational imaginary, and everyday geographies of the nation-state, Antipode, 35, 622, 10.1111/1467-8330.00342 · DOI
  22. Painter, 2006, Prosaic geographies of stateness, Political Geography, 25, 752, 10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.07.004 · DOI
  23. Slack, 2016, On narco-coyotaje: Illicit regimes and their impacts on the US-Mexico border, Antipode, 48, 1380, 10.1111/anti.12242 · DOI
  24. Squire, 2014, Desert “trash”: Posthumanism, border struggles, and humanitarian politics, Political Geography, 39, 11, 10.1016/j.polgeo.2013.12.003 · DOI
  25. Sundberg, 2008, “Trash-talk” and the production of quotidian geopolitical boundaries in the USA-Mexico borderlands, Social & Cultural Geography, 9, 871, 10.1080/14649360802441424 · DOI
  26. Sundberg, 2011, Diabolic caminos in the desert & cat fights on the Río: A post-humanist political ecology of boundary enforcement in the United States-Mexico borderlands, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101, 318, 10.1080/00045608.2010.538323 · DOI
  27. Walters, 2014, Drone strikes, dingpolitik and beyond: Furthering the debate on materiality and security, Security Dialogue, 45, 101, 10.1177/0967010613519162 · DOI
  28. Witmore, 2014, Archaeology and the new materialisms, Journal of Contemporary Archaeology, 1, 203, 10.1558/jca.v1i2.16661 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Soto, G.
Venue
Political Geography
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
66
Pages
113-129
ISSN
0962-6298
Cited by
32
References
2
Language
en
Funders
  • Louise Foucar Marshall Dissertation Fellowship
  • University of Arizona School of Anthropology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review