CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 38Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementSustainable Design and DevelopmentService and Product Innovation

Supporting the Development of Environmentally Sustainable PSS by Means of the Ecodesign Maturity Model

Open access
Pigosso, Daniela C.A., McAloone, Tim C.·2015·Procedia CIRP
DOI 10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.091
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Despite their substantial potential for enabling increased environmental performance, product/service-systems (PSS) are not intrinsically environmentally sustainable. In order to ensure increased sustainability performance, PSSand related business models needs to be developed taking into account best practice for ecodesign implementation and management. The Ecodesign Maturity Model (EcoM2) is a management framework that supports manufacturing companies to consistently and systematicallyimplement ecodesign, based on a step-by-step approach. EcoM2 contains a database containing more than 600 practices, categorized into management practices, operational practices and methods &tools. Currently, only two management practices of theEcoM2address PSS development. This paper aims to identify the best practices for PSS development, based on a literature review, followed by a presentation of a proposal for the integration of the new practices for PSS development into the EcoM2. In total, 17 best practices for PSS development were identified in this research, and integrated into the EcoM2. The proposed EcoM2 for PSS model has the potential to support the development of environmentally sustainable PSS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.091

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Developing resource-efficient and effective business models based on PSS offerings is still reported as challenging for companies.

    “Despite the availability of an increasing amount of academic content and approaches for BM innovation for CE (including PSS as a strategy) [9], developing resource-efficient and effective business models based on PSS offerings is still reported as challenging for companies [13,21,22].”

    From Configuring New Business Models for Circular Economy through Product–Service Systems (2019) · cites this paper as [22]

    Section 3 (page not available) says that developing PSS involves business models and other cross-functional considerations that may challenge companies unfamiliar with them. It also identifies a lack of environmental considerations in PSS development practices as a possible barrier to environmentally sustainable PSS. The paper does not specifically report that developing resource-efficient and effective PSS business models remains challenging for companies generally. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. F.H. Beuren, M.G. Gomes Ferreira, P. a. Cauchick Miguel, Product-service systems: a literature review on integrated products and services, J. Clean. Prod. 47 (2013) 222-231. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.028. · DOI
  2. N.M.P. Bocken, S.W. Short, P. Rana, S. Evans, A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes, J. Clean. Prod. 65 (2014) 45-56.
  3. A. Tukker, Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economy -a review, J. Clean. Prod. (2013). doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.049. · DOI · Paper page
  4. F. Giudice, G. La Rosa, A. Risitano, Product Design for the Environment: a life cycle approach, Taylor & Francis Group, 2006.
  5. W. Reim, V. Parida, D. Örtqvist, Product-Service Systems (PSS) Business Models and Tactics -A Systematic Literature Review, J. Clean. Prod. (2014). doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.003. · DOI
  6. M. Cook, Fluid transitions to more sustainable product service systems, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transitions. 12 (2014) 1-13. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2014.04.003. · DOI
  7. T.C. Kuo, M.L. Wang, The optimisation of maintenance service levels to support the product service system, Int. J. Prod. Res. 50 (2012) 6691-6708. doi:10.1080/00207543.2011.616916. · DOI
  8. A. Tukker, Eight types of product-service system: eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet, Bus. Strateg. Environ. 13 (2004) 246-260. doi:10.1002/bse.414. · DOI · Paper page
  9. A. Tukker, U. Tischner, Product-services as a research field: past, present and future. Reflections from a decade of research, J. Clean. Prod. 14 (2006) 1552-1556. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.01.022. · DOI · Paper page
  10. D.C.A. Pigosso, S.R. Souza, A.G. Filho, A.R. Ometto, H. ROZENFELD, Is the Industrial Product-Service System really sustainable?, in: Proc. 2nd CIRP IPS2 Conf. 2010, 2010: pp. 59-65.
  11. D.C.A. Pigosso, H. Rozenfeld, T.C. McAloone, Ecodesign maturity model: a management framework to support ecodesign implementation into manufacturing companies, J. Clean. Prod. (2013) 1-14. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.040. · DOI
  12. D.C.A. Pigosso, T.C. McAloone, H. Rozenfeld, Systematization of best practices for ecodesign implementation, in: Int. Des. Conf. -Des. 2014, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 2014: pp. 1651-1662.
  13. H. Rozenfeld, Reference model for managing product development, in: G. Seliger (Ed.), Sustain. Manuf., 1st editio, Springer, 2007: pp. 193-206.
  14. D.C. Amaral, H. Rozenfeld, Integrating new product development process references with maturity and change management models, in: ICED -Int. Conf. Egineering Des., Paris, 2007: pp. 631-632.
  15. W. Dewulf, J.R. Duflou, Integrating Eco-Design into Business Environments: A multi-level approach, in: D. Talaba, T. Roche (Eds.), Prod. Eng. Eco-Design, Technol. Green Energy Sources, 1st ed., Springer, 2004: p. 539.
  16. P. Gaiardelli, B. Resta, V. Martinez, R. Pinto, P. Albores, A classification model for product-service offerings, J. Clean. Prod. 66 (2014) 507-519. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.032. · DOI
  17. T.A. Tran, J.Y. Park, Development of integrated design methodology for various types of product -service systems, J. Comput. Des. Eng. 1 (2014) 37-47. doi:10.7315/JCDE.2014.004. · DOI
  18. S. Cavalieri, G. Pezzotta, Product-service systems engineering: State of the art and research challenges, Comput. Ind. 63 (2012) 278-288. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2012.02.006. · DOI
  19. B. Laperche, F. Picard, Environmental constraints, Product-Service Systems development and impacts on innovation management: learning from manufacturing firms in the French context, J. Clean. Prod. 53 (2013) 118-128. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro,2013.03.047. · DOI
  20. K.F. De Castro Rodrigues, V. Nappi, H. Rozenfeld, A proposal to support the value proposition in product oriented service business model of product service systems, Procedia CIRP. 16 (2014) 211-216. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2014.02.009. · DOI
  21. A.R.Tan, D. Matzen, T.C. McAloone, S. Evans, Strategies for designing and developing services for manufacturing firms, CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 3 (2010) 90-97. doi:10.1016/j.cirpj.2010.01.001. · DOI
  22. X. Geng, X. Chu, D. Xue, Z. Zhang, An integrated approach for rating engineering characteristics' final importance in product-service system development, Comput. Ind. Eng. 59 (2010) 585-594. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2010.07.002. · DOI
  23. M. Lindahl, T. Sakao, E. Carlsson, Actor's and system maps for Integrated Product Service Offerings -Practical experience from two companies, Procedia CIRP. 16 (2014) 320-325. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2014.01.030. · DOI
  24. D. Opresnik, M. Taisch, The value of Big Data in servitization, Intern. J. Prod. Econ. (2015) 1-11. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.12.036. · DOI
  25. A. Bertoni, M. Bertoni, O. Isaksson, Value visualization in Product Service Systems preliminary design, J. Clean. Prod. 53 (2013) 103-117. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.04.012. · DOI
  26. H. Li, Y. Ji, X. Gu, G. Qi, R. Tang, Module partition process model and method of integrated service product, Comput. Ind. 63 (2012) 298-308. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2012.02.015. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pigosso, D. C. A., & McAloone, T. C.
Affiliations
Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Corresponding author
Pigosso, Daniela C.A.
ORCID
Venue
Procedia CIRP
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015
Volume
30
Pages
173-178
ISSN
2212-8271 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.091
OpenAlex
W287376922
Cited by
38
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
7.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Procedia CIRP (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
Keywords
product-service systems, eco-design, environmental sustainability, best practices, business models, management practices, operational practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review