Cited by 29Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementPublic Procurement and PolicySustainable Design and Development

The use of public procurement to incentivize longer lifetime and remanufacturing of computers

Open access
Crafoord, Katarina, Dalhammar, Carl, Milios, Leonidas·2018·Procedia CIRP

Abstract

Improving the product lifetime of consumer electronics can provide significant environmental benefits. However, there is a tendency among both professional users and consumers to change products, like computers and mobile phones regularly, and as a result their lifetimes become increasingly shorter. With the rise of the Circular Economy, new policies to promote longer product lifetimes have emerged in Europe. These include the regulation of minimum product lifetime through the Ecodesign Directive, the extension of consumer warranties, and the French criminalization of planned obsolescence. Public procurement is an instrument with a significant potential to incentivize longer lifetimes. This study examines the potential for extending the lifetime of computers through public procurement in a Swedish context. The methods employed are literature reviews and interviews with procurers in municipalities, computer remanufacturers, suppliers of computers, and national authorities. There is increasing interest in promoting longer lifetimes through procurement among procuring organizations. Some Swedish municipalities are already procuring remanufactured computers, mainly for economic reasons, and they generally have positive experiences. However, remanufactured computers may not work for all kinds of functions, which highlight the importance of identifying needs of different users. Some municipalities do not plan to purchase remanufactured computers, outlining several barriers. The public sector can also support Circular Economy objectives through supporting recycled materials in new computers. In addition to procurement practices, the public sector can support remanufacturing through selling used computers to remanufacturers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.316

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The use of PSS in CPP has started to gain momentum in various sectors such as food systems, infrastructure and IT products.

    “The use of PSS in CPP has started to gain momentum in various sectors such as food systems (Molin et al., 2021), infrastructure (Lingegård et al., 2021a) and IT products (Crafoord et al., 2018).”

    From Implementation and management of a circular public procurement contract for furniture (2023) · cites this paper as Crafoord et al., 2018

    Section 2.1 (The companies; page unavailable) reports that more municipalities are procuring remanufactured computers, supporting growing public procurement activity for IT products. It describes purchases, however, and does not establish growing use of product-service systems (PSS) in that procurement. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Ranta V, Aarikka-Stenroos L, Ritala P, Mäkinen SJ. Exploring institutional drivers and barriers of the circular economy: a cross-regional comparison of China, the US, and Europe. Resources Conservation and Recycling (in press). doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.017 · DOI
  2. Milios L. Advancing to a Circular Economy: three essential ingredients for a comprehensive policy mix. Sustainability Science (in press). doi:10.1007/s11625-017-0502-9 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Tasaki T, Motoshita M, Uchida H, Suzuki, Y. Assessing the Replacement of Electrical Home Appliances for the Environment. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2013; 17:290-298.
  4. Ardente F, Mathieux F. Identification and Assessment of Product's Measures to Improve Resource Efficiency: The Case-Study of an Energy Using Product. Journal of Cleaner Production 2014; 83: 126-141
  5. Sundin E, Lee HM. In what way is remanufacturing good for the environment?, Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing (EcoDesign-11) Kyoto, Japan; 2011. p. 551-556.
  6. Maitre-Ekern E, Dalhammar C. Regulating planned obsolescence: a review of legal approaches to increase product durability and reparability in Europe. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law (RECIEL) 2016; 25: 378-394.
  7. Grandia J, Groeneveld S, Kuipers B, Steijn B. Sustainable procurement in practice: explaining the degree of sustainable procurement from an organisational perspective. In: Decarolis F, Frey M. (Eds.), Public Procurement's Place in the World: the Charge towards Sustainability and Innovation. Palgrave Mac-Millan, Basingsstoke; 2013. p. 37-62.
  8. Lundberg S, Marklund P, Strömbäck E, Sundström D. Using public procurement to implement environmental policy: an empirical analysis. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies 2015; 17 (4): 487-520.
  9. Preuss L. Buying into our future: sustainability initiatives in local government procurement. Business Strategy Environment 2007; 16(5): 354-365.
  10. Aldenius M, Khan J. Strategic use of green public procurement in the bus sector: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production 2017; 164: 250-257.
  11. Leire C, Dalhammar C. Long-term Market Effects of Green Public Procurement. In: Maitre-Ekern, E., C. Dalhammar & H.C. Bugge. (Eds.). Preventing environmental damage from products -Analyses of the Policy and Regulatory Framework in Europe. Forthcoming, Cambridge University Press.
  12. Bratt C, Hallstedt S, Robert KH, Broman G, Oldmark J. Assessment of criteria development for public procurement from a strategic sustainability perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production 2013; 52: 309- 316.
  13. Grandia J. Finding the missing link: examining the mediating role of sustainable public procurement behaviour. Journal of Cleaner Production 2016; 124: 183-190.
  14. Testa F, Annunziata E, Iraldo F, Frey M. Drawbacks and opportunities of green public procurement: an effective tool for sustainable production. Journal of Cleaner Production 2016; 112: 1893-1900.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crafoord, K., Dalhammar, C., & Milios, L.
Affiliations
  • Örebro Municipality (SE)
  • Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Dalhammar, Carl
Venue
Procedia CIRP
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018
Volume
73
Pages
137-141
ISSN
2212-8271 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2809692895
Cited by
29
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
FWCI
7.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Procedia CIRP (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Stiftelsen för Miljöstrategisk Forskning
  • Stiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
Keywords
public procurement, product life extension, remanufacturing, computers, consumer electronics, circular economy, planned obsolescence, Ecodesign Directive, municipalities, recycled materials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review