Cited by 230Strategic Planning and AnalysisCompetitive and Knowledge IntelligenceBig Data and Business Intelligence

Design of a SWOT Analysis Model and its Evaluation in Diverse Digital Business Ecosystem Contexts

Open access
Namugenyi, Christine, Nimmagadda, Shastri L, Reiners, Torsten·2019·Procedia Computer Science

Abstract

Investigating the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) of enterprise systems is popular among business researchers in major organizations. Many establishments carry out SWOT analysis at strategic planning, quality control while formulating government policies and legislations. In the digital ecosystems scenarios, the SWOT activities need a great deal of attention, in particular, while designing and promoting new strategies of multiple industry scenarios in the Integrated Project Management context, keeping in view complex business operations. Information solutions may not have choices, failing to address priorities and provide alternate solutions. We focus on digital ecosystem methodologies, in which the business and organizational issues, challenges and priorities are addressed. The purpose of the research is designing a new SWOT model in which the elements are modelled to interrogate managers’ views to oversee new insights of a variety of business contexts that can guide SWOT analyzers and provide digital ecosystem services in multiple industry operations in an optimum manner. Issues and challenges of elements of SWOT of several public and private sector companies are analyzed, documented and modelled to evaluate unified metadata representing multiple industry views, their visualization and interpretation in new knowledge domains.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.283

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ordinarily, a SWOT analysis allows researchers to identify potential threats and weaknesses and improve existing strategies by utilizing new opportunities or neutralizing potential threats.

    “Ordinarily, a SWOT analysis allows researchers to identify potential threats and weaknesses and improve existing strategies by utilizing new opportunities or neutralizing potential threats [19].”

    From The Perspective of Large-Scale Production of Algae Biodiesel (2020) · cites this paper as [19]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Arnott, D. (2008) Success Factors for Data Warehouse and Business Intelligence Systems, AIS Electronic Library, ACIS 2008 Proceedings, Christchurch, New Zealand.
  2. Baltzan, P. (2017) Business Driven Technology, 7 th Edition, Kindle Edition, McGraw-Hill Higher Education, USA.
  3. Jeyaraj, K L., Muralidharan, C., Senthilvelan, T. and Deshmukh, S. G (2012). Application of SWOT and Principal Component Analysis in a Textile Company -a Case Study, International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, Vol. 1, Issue 9, pp. 46-54.
  4. Nimmagadda, S.L., Reiners, T. and Wood, L.C. (2018) On big data-guided upstream business research and its knowledge management, Journal of Business Research, 89: pp. 143-158.
  5. Phadermrod, B. Crowder, R. M. and Wills, G. B. (2016) Importance-Performance Analysis based SWOT analysis, a preprint submitted to International Journal of Information Management.
  6. Prater, E. and Whitehead, K. (2012) An Introduction to Supply Chain Management: A Global Supply Chain Support, Perspective, Business Expert Press.
  7. Tambe, P. R. (2015) Overview of Indian Fertiliser and SWOT Analysis of Fertiliser Industry, Paridnya -The MIBM Research Journal, Vol- 3, Issue-1.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Namugenyi, C., Nimmagadda, S. L., & Reiners, T.
Affiliations
  • IIE MSA (ZA)
  • Curtin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Nimmagadda, Shastri L
Venue
Procedia Computer Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019
Volume
159
Pages
1145-1154
ISSN
1877-0509 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2980599920
Cited by
230
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 7
FWCI
66.96
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Procedia Computer Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Strategic Planning and Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Big Data and Business Intelligence
Keywords
SWOT analysis, digital business ecosystems, enterprise systems, strategic planning, integrated project management, metadata

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review