Cited by 39Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentPain Mechanisms and Treatments

Neurophysiological mechanisms in acceptance and commitment therapy in opioid-addicted patients with chronic pain

Open access
Smallwood, Rachel F., Potter, Jennifer S., Robin, Donald A.·2016·Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging

Abstract

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) has been effectively utilized to treat both chronic pain and substance use disorder independently. Given these results and the vital need to treat the comorbidity of the two disorders, a pilot ACT treatment was implemented in individuals with comorbid chronic pain and opioid addiction. This pilot study supported using neurophysiology to characterize treatment effects and revealed that, following ACT, participants with this comorbidity exhibited reductions in brain activation due to painful stimulus and in connectivity at rest.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2016.03.001

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ACT intervention decreases craving behaviour of drug abusers as well as reuse of substance, relieves pain in patients with chronic pain comorbid with opioid addiction and suppresses craving for opioids.

    “ACT intervention decreases the craving behaviour of drug abusers47 as well as reuse of substance,48 relieves pain in patients with chronic pain comorbid with opioid addiction and suppresses craving for opioids.49”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smallwood, R. F., Potter, J. S., & Robin, D. A.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
Corresponding author
Smallwood, Rachel F.
Venue
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
250
Pages
12-14
ISSN
0925-4927 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2300966694
Cited by
39
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
4.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • NIH
  • NIDA (K23DA022297-04)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, opioid use disorder, chronic pain, neurophysiological mechanisms, resting-state functional connectivity, treatment effects
MeSH terms
Adult, Analgesics, Opioid, Brain, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Opioid-Related Disorders, Pilot Projects, Comorbidity, Behavior, Addictive, Chronic Pain, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review