Cited by 439Astro and Planetary ScienceSpace Satellite Systems and ControlStellar, planetary, and galactic studies

NEOWISE OBSERVATIONS OF NEAR-EARTH OBJECTS: PRELIMINARY RESULTS

Open access
Mainzer, A., Grav, T., Bauer, J., Masiero, J., McMillan, R. S., Cutri, R. M., Walker, R., Wright, E. +29 more·2011·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

With the NEOWISE portion of the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer ( WISE ) project, we have carried out a highly uniform survey of the near-Earth object (NEO) population at thermal infrared wavelengths ranging from 3 to 22 μm, allowing us to refine estimates of their numbers, sizes, and albedos. The NEOWISE survey detected NEOs the same way whether they were previously known or not, subject to the availability of ground-based follow-up observations, resulting in the discovery of more than 130 new NEOs. The survey's uniform sensitivity, observing cadence, and image quality have permitted extrapolation of the 428 near-Earth asteroids (NEAs) detected by NEOWISE during the fully cryogenic portion of the WISE mission to the larger population. We find that there are 981 ± 19 NEAs larger than 1 km and 20,500 ± 3000 NEAs larger than 100 m. We show that the Spaceguard goal of detecting 90% of all 1 km NEAs has been met, and that the cumulative size distribution is best represented by a broken power law with a slope of 1.32 ± 0.14 below 1.5 km. This power-law slope produces ∼13, 200 ± 1900 NEAs with D > 140 m. Although previous studies predict another break in the cumulative size distribution below D ∼ 50–100 m, resulting in an increase in the number of NEOs in this size range and smaller, we did not detect enough objects to comment on this increase. The overall number for the NEA population between 100 and 1000 m is lower than previous estimates. The numbers of near-Earth comets and potentially hazardous NEOs will be the subject of future work.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/743/2/156

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 164207 has absolute magnitude 21.1 mag, albedo 0.219, and diameter 163 m.

    “its absolute magnitude has a value of 21.1 mag and its albedo is 0.219 with a diameter of 163 m (Mainzer et al. 2011).”

    From Asteroid 2014 OL339: yet another Earth quasi-satellite (2014) · cites this paper as Mainzer et al. 2011

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Bowell, E., Hapke, B., Domingue, D., et al. 1989, in Asteroids II, ed. R. P. Binzel, T. Gehrels, & M. S. Matthews (Tucson, AZ: Univ. Arizona Press), 524
  2. Gaffey, M., Cloutis, E. A., Kelley, M. S., & Reed, K. L. 2002, in Asteroids III, ed. W. F. Bottke, A. Cellino, P. Paolicchi, & R. P. Binzel (Tuscon, AZ: Univ. Arizona Press), 183
  3. Harris, A. W. 2006, in Proc. 229th Symposium of the IAU on Asteroids, Comets, Meteors, Bzios, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2005 August 7-12, ed.
  4. L. Daniela, M. Sylvio Ferraz, & F. J. Angel (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press), 449
  5. Hildebrand, A., Penfield, G., Kring, D., et al. 1991, Geology, 19, 867 · DOI
  6. Jedicke, R., Larsen, J., & Spahr, T. 2002, in Asteroids III, ed. W. F. Bottke, A. Cellino, P. Paolicchi, & R. P. Binzel (Tucson, AZ: Univ. Arizona Press)
  7. Lebofsky, L., & Spencer, J. 1989, Asteroids II (Tucson, AZ: Univ. Arizona Press), 128
  8. Liu, F., Cutri, R., Greanias, G., et al. 2008, Proc. SPIE, 7017, 16
  9. Mainzer, A., Eisenhardt, P., Wright, E. L., et al. 2005, Proc. SPIE, 5899, 262
  10. McMillan, R. S. 2007, in IAU Symp. 236, Near Earth Objects, Our Celestial Neighbors: Opportunity and Risk, ed. G. B. Valsecchi, D. Vokrouhlicky, & A. Milani (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press), 329
  11. Ryan, E., & Ryan, W. 2008, in Proc. 2008 AMOS Technical Conference, ed. S. Ryan (The Maui Economic Development Board), E41

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mainzer, A., Grav, T., Bauer, J., Masiero, J., McMillan, R. S., Cutri, R. M., Walker, R., Wright, E., Eisenhardt, P., Tholen, D. J., Spahr, T., Jedicke, R., Denneau, L., DeBaun, E., Elsbury, D., Gautier, T., Gomillion, S., Hand, E., Mo, W., Watkins, J., Wilkins, A., Bryngelson, G. L., Del Pino Molina, A., Desai, S., Camus, M. G., Hidalgo, S. L., Konstantopoulos, I., Larsen, J. A., Maleszewski, C., Malkan, M. A., Mauduit, J.-C., Mullan, B. L., Olszewski, E. W., Pforr, J., Saro, A., Scotti, J. V., & Wasserman, L. H.
Affiliations
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • Monterey Institute for Research in Astronomy (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
  • Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory (US)
  • Dartmouth College (US)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Daytona Beach Florida Campus (US)
  • University of Missouri–Kansas City (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • Clemson University (US)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Universidad Andrés Bello (CL)
  • Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias (ES)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • United States Naval Academy (US)
  • University of Portsmouth (GB)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • Lowell Observatory (US)
Corresponding author
Mainzer, A.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2011-12-02
Volume
743
Issue
2
Pages
156
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2163755141
Cited by
439
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 22
FWCI
14.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • ArTS Archivio della ricerca di Trieste (University of Trieste https://www.units.it/) (submittedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Smithsonian Institution
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • Yale University
  • California Institute of Technology
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • Harvard University
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory
  • University of California, Los Angeles
  • Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory
  • Planetary Science Division
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Keywords
near-Earth objects, NEOWISE, WISE, asteroid size distribution, asteroid albedo, asteroid discovery, near-Earth asteroids, potentially hazardous asteroids, thermal infrared observations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review