Cited by 33Planetary Science and ExplorationSpacecraft Design and TechnologyAstro and Planetary Science

Searching for potential ice-rich mining sites on the Moon with the Lunar Volatiles Scout

Biswas, J., Sheridan, S., Pitcher, C., Richter, L., Reganaz, M., Barber, S.J., Reiss, P.·2020·Planetary and Space Science

Abstract

Multiple remote observations have indicated the existence of ice deposits in permanently shadowed regions (PSRs) near the lunar poles, nurturing hopes of possible future resource exploitation. However, the interpretation of the orbital data remains ambiguous and ground truth data is necessary for validation. The Lunar Volatiles Scout (LVS) is an integrated instrument for regolith sampling, gas extraction , and analysis that enables mobile prospecting for lunar volatiles, such as loosely adsorbed water and subsurface ice up to a depth of 10 ​cm. This study presents results of breadboarding activities using an integrated prototype of the LVS instrument to investigate soil insertion and to demonstrate gas extraction and analysis in thermal vacuum. The required vertical force for LVS insertion into dry and ice-bearing regolith was determined to be less than 15 ​N and sample-to-sample cross-contamination was found to be negligible. Thermal-vacuum test results proved the successful extraction of water from a hydrated lunar regolith simulant and detection of species across a mass to charge ratio m/z range of 15–200.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pss.2019.104826

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Biswas, J., Sheridan, S., Pitcher, C., Richter, L., Reganaz, M., Barber, S. J., & Reiss, P.
Affiliations
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • The Open University (GB)
  • European Space Agency (FR)
Corresponding author
Biswas, J.
Venue
Planetary and Space Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
181
Pages
104826
ISSN
0032-0633 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2995207868
Cited by
33
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Planetary and Space Science (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Online (The Open University) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
Keywords
lunar water ice, permanently shadowed regions, lunar poles, lunar volatiles, subsurface ice, gas extraction, water extraction, insertion force, cross-contamination, thermal vacuum testing, breadboarding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review