Cited by 151Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesSchizophrenia research and treatmentForensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis

Psychiatric comorbidity in methamphetamine dependence

Open access
Salo, Ruth, Flower, Keith, Kielstein, Anousheh, Leamon, Martin H., Nordahl, Thomas E., Galloway, Gantt P.·2011·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

The primary aim of the present study was to assess the prevalence of psychiatric comorbidity in a large sample of methamphetamine (MA)-dependent subjects using a validated structured clinical interview, without limitation to sexual orientation or participation in a treatment program. The secondary aim was to assess whether the prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities varied by gender. Structured clinical interviews (SCIDs) were administered to 189 MA-dependent subjects and lifetime prevalence of DSM-IV diagnoses was assessed. Across the sample, 28.6% had primary psychotic disorders, 23.8% of which were substance-induced; 13.2% had MA-induced delusional disorders and 11.1% had MA-induced hallucinations. A substantial number of lifetime mood disorders were identified that were not substance-induced (32.3%), whereas 14.8% had mood disorders induced by substances, and 10.6% had mood disorders induced by amphetamines. Of all participants, 26.5% had anxiety disorders and 3.7% had a substance-induced anxiety disorder, all of which were induced by MA. Male subjects reported a higher percentage of MA-induced delusions compared to female abusers. Given the impact of MA psychosis and other drug-induced symptoms on hospitals and mental health services, the description and characterization of comorbid psychiatric symptoms associated with MA use is of paramount importance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.09.014

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Methamphetamine use is highly comorbid with anxiety disorders and psychological interventions are currently the front-line treatment for stimulants, yet studies investigating the effectiveness of psychological interventions among patients with comorbid anxiety disorders remain under researched.

    “Methamphetamine use is highly comorbid with anxiety disorders and psychological interventions are currently the front-line treatment for stimulants, yet studies investigating the effectiveness of psychological interventions among patients with comorbid anxiety disorders remain under researched.(Salo et al., 2011; Stuart et al., 2020)”

    From A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for persons with comorbid anxiety and substance use disorders (2024) · cites this paper as Salo et al., 2011

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salo, R., Flower, K., Kielstein, A., Leamon, M. H., Nordahl, T. E., & Galloway, G. P.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • California Pacific Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Galloway, Gantt P.
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-04
Volume
186
Issue
2-3
Pages
356-361
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2022547601
Cited by
151
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01da010739-03)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA16329, DA 10641, R21DA014359, R21DA016329, DA14359, R01DA010641, DA10739, K01DA016293)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Keywords
methamphetamine dependence, psychiatric comorbidity, drug-induced psychosis, delusional disorder, hallucinations, mood disorders, anxiety disorders, gender differences, lifetime prevalence, DSM-IV diagnosis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Severity of Illness Index, Comorbidity, Amphetamine-Related Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review