Cited by 91Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchDigital Mental Health InterventionsTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Efficacy of an internet-based intervention for posttraumatic stress disorder in Iraq: a pilot study

Wagner, Birgit, Schulz, Wassima, Knaevelsrud, Christine·2012·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

In the past 20 years, war and human rights violations have led to high rates of exposure to traumatic events among the Iraqi population. Due to the ongoing violence, many physicians and mental health professionals have left Iraq in recent years. The Internet offers new possibilities for the psychological treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in conflict areas. A therapist-supported cognitive-behavioral treatment manual that has been evaluated in Western countries was translated into Arabic and culturally adapted. The treatment was conducted via the Internet by Arabic-speaking therapists and was evaluated in an uncontrolled pilot study with 15 participants. Main outcome measures were PTSD (Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale (PDS)), depression, anxiety (Hopkins Symptom Check List-25 (HSCL-25)), and quality of life (EUROHIS). The intervention resulted in a highly significant decrease in symptoms of PTSD, depression, and anxiety. Quality of life was higher at posttreatment. All treatment effect sizes were in the large range, indicating a significant improvement in mental health symptoms and quality of life. Preliminary clinical evidence indicates that new technologies can be used to provide humanitarian aid in the form of e-mental health services, even in areas that remain highly unstable.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.07.026

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wagner, B., Schulz, W., & Knaevelsrud, C.
Affiliations
  • Leipzig University (DE)
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Wagner, Birgit
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
195
Issue
1-2
Pages
85-88
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049262007
Cited by
91
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
7.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, online intervention, cognitive behavioral therapy, e-mental health, war trauma, Iraq, depression, anxiety, quality of life, humanitarian aid
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Iraq, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Quality of Life, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review