Cited by 54Digital Mental Health InterventionsMental Health Treatment and AccessMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Internet and mobile technologies: addressing the mental health of trauma survivors in less resourced communities

Open access
Ruzek, J. I., Yeager, C. M.·2017·Global Mental Health

Abstract

Internet and mobile technologies offer potentially critical ways of delivering mental health support in low-resource settings. Much evidence indicates an enormous negative impact of mental health problems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and many of these problems are caused, or worsened, by exposure to wars, conflicts, natural and human-caused disasters, and other traumatic events. Though specific mental health treatments have been found to be efficacious and cost-effective for low-resource settings, most individuals living in these areas do not have access to them. Low-intensity task-sharing interventions will help, but there is a limit to the scalability and sustainability of human resources in these settings. To address the needs of trauma survivors, it will be important to develop and implement Internet and mobile technology resources to help reduce the scarcity, inequity, and inefficiency of current mental health services in LMICs. Mobile and Internet resources are experiencing a rapid growth in LMICs and can help address time, stigma, and cost barriers and connect those who have been socially isolated by traumatic events. This review discusses current research in technological interventions in low-resource settings and outlines key issues and future challenges and opportunities. Though formidable challenges exist for large-scale deployment of mobile and Internet mental health technologies, work to date indicates that these technologies are indeed feasible to develop, evaluate, and deliver to those in need of mental health services, and that they can be effective.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/gmh.2017.11

Cites

98 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 2010, mhGAP Intervention Guide for Mental, Neurological and Substance use Disorders in Non-specialized Health Settings: Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP)
  2. Heinzelman, 2010, Crowdsourcing crisis information in disaster, Physical Review Letters, 96, 258102
  3. 2001, World Health Report. Mental Health: New Understanding, New Hope

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ruzek, J. I., & Yeager, C. M.
Affiliations
  • Palo Alto University (US)
  • University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
Corresponding author
Ruzek, J. I.
Venue
Global Mental Health
Published
2017
Volume
4
Pages
e16-e16
ISSN
2054-4251 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2752325749
Cited by
54
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cambridge Prisms Global Mental Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Cambridge
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
mobile mental health, trauma survivors, resource-limited settings, low- and middle-income countries, task sharing, access to mental health care, stigma, social isolation, scalability and sustainability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review