Cited by 29Eating Disorders and BehaviorsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesProblem Solving Skills Development

An experimental exploration of social problem solving and its associated processes in anorexia nervosa

Sternheim, Lot, Startup, Helen, Pretorius, Natalie, Johnson-Sabine, Eric, Schmidt, Ulrike, Channon, Shelley·2012·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

People with Anorexia Nervosa (AN) have well-documented socio-emotional and neurocognitive impairments. As yet, little is known about their ability to solve problems in social situations, although a link with cognitive avoidance has been suggested. This study explored social problem-solving (SPS), using an experimental task. Secondly, the role of cognitive avoidance in SPS was investigated. Individuals with AN (n=31) and healthy controls (HC; n=39) completed the Social Problem Resolution Task which consists of problem scenarios involving awkward everyday social situations. Participants were asked to generate both the optimal solution and their personal solution. Solutions were rated in terms of how socially sensitive and practically effective they were. AN patients produced relatively poorer personal solutions compared to optimal solutions than HC participants and had higher scores on a measure of cognitive avoidance than the HC group. In AN patients, cognitive avoidance was partially associated with poor SPS. These findings suggest that whilst people with AN have no difficulty in generating socially sensitive and effective solutions to problems, but may have difficulty applying this knowledge to themselves.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.06.029

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous experimental and self-report studies on social problem solving in anorexia nervosa did not consider or control for the impact of anxiety or depression.

    “both the experimental study (Sternheim et al., 2012) and the three self‐report studies (Paterson et al., 2007; Patterson et al., 2010; Swanson et al., 2010) did not consider the role of, or, control for the impact of anxiety/depression on social problem solving”
  • In people with anorexia nervosa, when asked what they themselves would do in awkward social situations, they generated fewer optimal solutions than non-anorexia nervosa controls, although they generated optimal solutions for a hypothetical character as effectively as controls.

    “While people with AN were able to generate optimal solutions for the hypothetical character that were as effective as those generated by a non‐AN control group, when asked what they themselves would do in that situation, they generated fewer optimal solutions.”
  • The high levels of avoidant social problem-solving style reported by participants in this study are typical of other avoidant styles of coping and avoidant behavior in AN, such as safety behaviors and cognitive avoidance strategies.

    “In addition, the high levels of avoidant social problem‐solving style reported by the participants in this study are typical of the other avoidant styles of coping and avoidant behavior in AN, such as safety behaviors and cognitive avoidance strategies (Pallister & Waller, 2008; Sternheim et al., 2012).”
  • These results corroborate previous research demonstrating maladaptive social problem-solving styles and attitudes in AN.

    “These results corroborate previous research (Paterson et al., 2007; Patterson et al., 2010; Sternheim et al., 2012; Swanson et al., 2010) demonstrating maladaptive social problem‐solving styles and attitudes in AN.”
  • Sternheim et al. (2012) found that those with AN generated solutions comparable in effectiveness to healthy control participants when it regarded a hypothetical character, but generated much poorer solutions when it regarded themselves.

    “Similarly, Sternheim et al. (2012) found that while those with AN generated solutions comparable in effectiveness to HC participants when it regarded a hypothetical character, yet generated much poorer solutions when it regarded themselves.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sternheim, L., Startup, H., Pretorius, N., Johnson-Sabine, E., Schmidt, U., & Channon, S.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Sternheim, Lot
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-12
Volume
200
Issue
2-3
Pages
524-529
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091194549
Cited by
29
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) (RP-PG-0606-1043)
  • Local Scholar in the Marie Curie Research Training Network INTACT (MRTN-CT-2006-035988)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Problem Solving Skills Development
Keywords
anorexia nervosa, social problem solving, cognitive avoidance, social sensitivity, neurocognitive impairment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anorexia Nervosa, Anxiety, Cognition, Depression, Emotions, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Neuropsychological Tests, Problem Solving, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Behavior, Social Perception, Body Mass Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review