Cited by 47Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

Suicidal ideation and risk factors in primary care patients with anxiety disorders

Open access
Bomyea, Jessica, Lang, Ariel J., Craske, Michelle G., Chavira, Denise, Sherbourne, Cathy D., Rose, Raphael D., Golinelli, Daniela, Campbell-Sills, Laura +5 more·2013·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

The presence of an anxiety disorder is associated with greater frequency of suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Given the high personal and societal costs of suicidal behaviors, suicide prevention is a priority. Understanding factors present within individuals with anxiety disorders that increase suicide risk may inform prevention efforts. The aims of the present study were to examine the prevalence of suicidal ideation and behaviors, as well as factors associated with suicide risk in patients with anxiety disorders in primary care. Data from a large scale randomized controlled study were analyzed to assess prevalence of suicidal thoughts and behaviors, as well as factors associated with suicide risk. Results revealed that suicidal ideation and behaviors were relatively common in this group. When examining mental and physical health factors jointly, presence of depression, mental health-related impairment, and social support each uniquely accounted for variance in suicide risk score. Methodological limitations include cross-sectional data collection and lack of information on comorbid personality disorders. Moreover, patients included were from a clinical trial with exclusion criteria that may limit generalizability. Results highlight the complex determinants of suicidal behavior and the need for more nuanced suicide assessment in this population, including evaluation of comorbidity and general functioning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.03.017

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals with SAD endorse SI, with 16% reporting SI in the previous month and 18% reporting a history of suicide attempts.

    “Research highlights individuals with SAD endorse SI, with 16% of individuals with SAD reporting SI in the previous month and 18% reporting a history of suicide attempts (Cougle et al., 2009; Bomyea et al., 2013).”

    From Can dialectical behavior therapy skills group treat social anxiety disorder? A brief integrative review (2024) · cites this paper as Bomyea et al., 2013

    Results §3.1 reports that 16% had thoughts of suicide in the previous month and 18% had a history of suicide attempts. Those figures describe the study’s overall sample of primary-care patients with anxiety disorders, not individuals with SAD specifically; the Discussion (§4) likewise describes them as sample-wide figures. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bomyea, J., Lang, A. J., Craske, M. G., Chavira, D., Sherbourne, C. D., Rose, R. D., Golinelli, D., Campbell-Sills, L., Welch, S. S., Sullivan, G., Bystritsky, A., Roy-Byrne, P., & Stein, M. B.
Affiliations
  • San Diego State University (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • RAND Corporation (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Bomyea, Jessica
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-08
Volume
209
Issue
1
Pages
60-65
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1981937730
Cited by
47
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6
FWCI
4.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • American Foundation for Suicide Prevention
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (U01MH057835, K24MH065324, F31MH088170, K24MH064122, K24MH64122, U01MH070022, U01MH070018, U01MH057858, U01MH058915)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
suicidal ideation, suicide risk factors, anxiety disorders, primary care patients, suicide prevention, depression, social support, suicide assessment, comorbidities
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychological Tests, Regression Analysis, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Social Support, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review