Cited by 66Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityMental Health Treatment and AccessImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Psychiatric patients׳ internet use corresponds to the internet use of the general public

Trefflich, Friederike, Kalckreuth, Sophie, Mergl, Roland, Rummel-Kluge, Christine·2015·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

The use of Internet has grown in the past number of years, including the increased application of various therapy programs for psychiatric patients which can be accessed online. Few studies investigating psychiatric patients' Internet use exist. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the number of psychiatric patients that use the Internet in comparison to the general population. Since patients with mental health disorders frequently suffer from a variety of disadvantages in society, it was evaluated whether psychiatric patients were disadvantaged particularly concerning the use and access of the Internet. Three hundred and thirty-seven patients participated in the study and completed a 29-item questionnaire. A response rate of 66% was achieved. Descriptive statistics, analysis of variance and binary logistic regression analysis were used. Out of the participants, 79.5% were Internet users. This number corresponds to the Internet use of the general population. Young patients in particular were found to use online information, using mostly search engines to seek medical information. The results show that psychiatric patients do not rank below the general population concerning the frequency of Internet use, which is especially important for accessing health related information online or participating in online programs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.12.037

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Initial studies from 2015 found that nearly half of a sample of psychiatric patients were social media users, with greater use among younger individuals.

    “Initial studies from 2015 found that nearly half of a sample of psychiatric patients were social media users, with greater use among younger individuals (Trefflich, Kalckreuth, Mergl, & Rummel-Kluge, 2015)”

    From Social Media and Mental Health: Benefits, Risks, and Opportunities for Research and Practice (2020) · cites this paper as Trefflich, Kalckreuth, Mergl, & Rummel-Kluge, 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trefflich, F., Kalckreuth, S., Mergl, R., & Rummel-Kluge, C.
Affiliations
Leipzig University (DE)
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
226
Issue
1
Pages
136-141
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994683846
Cited by
66
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4
FWCI
12.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
internet use, psychiatric patients, mental illness, online health information, online therapy, digital divide, search engines, young patients
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patients, Surveys and Questionnaires, Persons with Mental Disabilities, Persons with Intellectual Disabilities, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review