Cited by 257Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityMental Health Treatment and AccessImpact of Technology on Adolescents

The internet as a setting for mental health service utilisation by young people

Burns, Jane M, Davenport, Tracey A, Durkin, Lauren A, Luscombe, Georgina M, Hickie, Ian B·2010·Medical Journal of Australia

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore patterns of internet use by young people in Australia and assess the usefulness of online resources for mental health problems, exploring functionality that may be relevant in the development of online mental health services. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional survey of a nationally representative sample of young people (2000 randomly selected participants aged 12-25 years), via telephone interview, conducted in January-March 2008. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patterns of internet use including type of use, social networking, sources of information about mental health, alcohol or other substance use problems and levels of satisfaction with the information, and type of information accessed via websites. RESULTS: Young people reported using the internet to connect with other young people (76.9%; 1464/1905) and to seek information about a mental health problem, regardless of whether they had a problem themselves (38.8%; 735/1894). Twenty per cent of young people (398/1990) had personally experienced a mental health problem in the previous 5 years; when these people were asked about sources of information used for this problem, 30.8% (70/227) reported searching the internet. Patterns of internet use and types of resources used differed by age and sex. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that technology is important in the everyday lives of young people, and online mental health services that encompass promotion and prevention activities should include a variety of resources that appeal to all ages and both sexes, such as "question and answer" forums and email.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03688.x

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burns, J. M., Davenport, T. A., Durkin, L. A., Luscombe, G. M., & Hickie, I. B.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Inspire Foundation, Sydney, NSW.
Corresponding author
Burns, Jane M
Venue
Medical Journal of Australia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-06
Volume
192
Issue
S11
Pages
S22-6
ISSN
  • 0025-729X (ISSN-L)
  • 1326-5377
OpenAlex
W2427563253
Cited by
257
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
15.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Medical Journal of Australia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Sydney
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
internet use, youth, mental health service utilization, online mental health services, mental health information seeking, social networking, age and sex differences, mental health promotion and prevention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Adult, Age Factors, Australia, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Mental Health Services, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Sex Factors, Social Support, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review