Cited by 33Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Cognitive behavioral therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder in individuals with severe mental illness and borderline personality disorder

Open access
Kredlow, M. Alexandra, Szuhany, Kristin L., Lo, Stephen, Xie, Haiyi, Gottlieb, Jennifer D., Rosenberg, Stanley D., Mueser, Kim T.·2017·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

Secondary analyses were performed on data from two randomized controlled trials of a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) program for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in individuals with severe mental illness (SMI) to examine the feasibility, tolerability, and effectiveness for individuals with borderline personality disorder (BPD). In Study 1, 27 participants received CBT or treatment as usual. In Study 2, 55 participants received CBT or a Brief treatment. Feasibility and tolerability of CBT, PTSD symptoms, and other mental health and functional outcomes were examined, with assessments at baseline, post-treatment, and two follow-up time points. CBT was feasible and tolerable in this population. Study 1 participants in CBT improved significantly more in PTSD symptoms, depression, and self-reported physical health. Study 2 participants in both CBT and Brief improved significantly in PTSD symptoms, posttraumatic cognitions, depression, and overall functioning, with those in CBT acquiring significantly more PTSD knowledge, and having marginally significantly greater improvement in PTSD symptoms. CBT for PTSD was feasible and tolerated in individuals with SMI, BPD, and PTSD, and associated with improvements in PTSD symptoms and related outcomes. Prospective research is needed to evaluate CBT in individuals with BPD, including comparing it with staged interventions for this population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.12.045

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CBT is viable and correlated with improvements in symptoms and associated results among people with severe mental illness and borderline personality disorder.

    “Additionally, research has demonstrated that cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is viable and correlated with ameliorations in symptoms and associated results among people who also suffer from severe mental illness and borderline personality disorder [70].”

    From Clinical Efficacy of Psychotherapeutic Interventions for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Analysis. (2024) · cites this paper as [70]

    The Abstract and Discussion report that CBT for PTSD was feasible and associated with improvements in PTSD symptoms and related outcomes among participants with severe mental illness, BPD, and PTSD. The citing sentence omits the PTSD condition and could be read as applying the finding to people with severe mental illness and BPD more generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams JBW 1996a Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis-I Disorders–Patient Edition (SCID-I/P, Version 2.0) New York State Psychiatric Institute
  2. Green BL 1996 Trauma History Questionnaire Stamm BH Measurement of Stress, Self-Report Trauma, and Adaptation Sidran Press Lutherville, MD

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kredlow, M. A., Szuhany, K. L., Lo, S., Xie, H., Gottlieb, J. D., Rosenberg, S. D., & Mueser, K. T.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Dartmouth College (US)
Corresponding author
Mueser, Kim T.
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
249
Pages
86-93
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2570086898
Cited by
33
References
44
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01MH064662, F31MH103969, F31MH100773)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, post-traumatic stress disorder, borderline personality disorder, severe mental illness, treatment feasibility, treatment tolerability, depression, posttraumatic cognitions, functional outcome, brief psychotherapy
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Borderline Personality Disorder, Depression, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review