Cited by 36Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesSchizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and Psychiatry

Insight and suicidality in psychosis: A cross-sectional study

Open access
Massons, Carmen, Lopez-Morinigo, Javier-David, Pousa, Esther, Ruiz, Ada, Ochoa, Susana, Usall, Judith, Nieto, Lourdes, Cobo, Jesus +2 more·2017·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

Aims We aimed to test whether specific insight dimensions are associated with suicidality in patients with psychotic disorders.Methods 143 patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders were recruited. Suicidality was assessed by item 8 of the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS). Insight was measured by the Scale of Unawareness of Mental Disorder (SUMD) and the Markova and Berrios Insight Scale. Bivariate analyses and multivariable logistic regression models were conducted.Results Those subjects aware of having a mental illness and its social consequences had higher scores on suicidality than those with poor insight. Awareness of the need for treatment was not linked with suicidality. The Markova and Berrios Insight scale total score and two specific domains (awareness of "disturbed thinking and loss of control over the situation" and "having a vague feeling that something is wrong") were related to suicidality. However, no insight dimensions survived the multivariable regression model, which found depression and previous suicidal behaviour to predict suicidality.Conclusions Suicidality in psychosis was linked with some insight dimensions: awareness of mental illness and awareness of social consequences, but not compliance. Depression and previous suicidal behaviour mediated the associations with insight; thus, predicting suicidality.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.02.059

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kemp, R. David, A. , 1997. Insight and compliance. In: Treatment Compliance and the Therapeutic Alliance in Serious Mental Illness (ed. B. Blackwell). Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, pp. 61 -84.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Massons, C., Lopez-Morinigo, J.-D., Pousa, E., Ruiz, A., Ochoa, S., Usall, J., Nieto, L., Cobo, J., David, A. S., & Dutta, R.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • Parc de Salut (ES)
  • Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (ES)
  • Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz (MX)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Massons, Carmen
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
252
Pages
147-153
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2592907907
Cited by
36
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5
FWCI
6.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Repositori digital de la UPF (Universitat Pompeu Fabra) (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Academy of Medical Sciences (AMS-CSF4-Dutta)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
insight, suicidality, psychosis, schizophrenia spectrum disorders, medication adherence, depression, Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia
MeSH terms
Adult, Awareness, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotic Disorders, Logistic Models, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review