Cited by 57Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchCOVID-19 and Mental HealthTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

PTSD treatment in times of COVID-19: A systematic review of the effects of online EMDR

Open access
Lenferink, L.I.M., Meyerbröker, K., Boelen, P.A.·2020·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

COVID-19 affects many societies by measures as "social distancing", forcing mental health care professionals to deliver treatments online or via telephone. In this context, online Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) is an emerging treatment for patients with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). We performed a systematic review of studies investigating online EMDR for PTSD. Only one trial was identified. That uncontrolled open trial showed promising results. There is an urgent need to further examine the effects of online EMDR for PTSD, before its wider dissemination is warranted. Remotely delivered cognitive behavioural therapy seems the preferred PTSD-treatment in times of COVID-19.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113438

Cites

13 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Generally EMDR is an effective and efficient therapy with a growing evidence base for remotely delivered EMDR.

    “Generally EMDR is an effective and efficient therapy with a growing evidence base for remotely delivered EMDR.33–37”

    From “It saved me”: A thematic analysis of experiences of psychological therapy following critical illness and intensive care (2024) · cites this paper as [37]

    The introduction in our copy says systematic reviews and meta-analyses found EMDR effective for reducing PTSD symptoms. But the review’s Abstract identifies only one uncontrolled online-EMDR trial and says further research is urgently needed before wider use. It does not establish that EMDR is efficient or that the evidence base for remotely delivered EMDR is growing. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • EMDR is effective in alleviating PTSD symptoms across a range of populations, including adults and Syrian refugees.

    “Research has shown that EMDR is effective in alleviating symptoms of PTSD across a range of populations, including adults and Syrian refugees [73,74].”

    From Clinical Efficacy of Psychotherapeutic Interventions for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Analysis. (2024) · cites this paper as [73]

    The paper states that systematic reviews and meta-analyses found EMDR effective in reducing PTSD symptoms. It also describes symptom reductions in an adult trial, but that trial combined online EMDR with CBT and could not isolate EMDR’s effect. No passage in our copy addresses Syrian refugees, so the claimed range of populations is not supported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. McNally, 2013, The evolving conceptualization and treatment of PTSD: a very brief history. Trauma Psychology Newsletter, Fall, 2013, 7

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lenferink, L. I. M., Meyerbröker, K., & Boelen, P. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Groningen (NL)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Lenferink, L.I.M.
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
293
Pages
113438
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3082966463
Cited by
56
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, EMDR, COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine, remote psychotherapy, social distancing, cognitive behavioral therapy, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Humans, Pneumonia, Viral, Social Isolation, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Telemedicine, Coronavirus Infections, Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review