Cited by 30Sports Performance and TrainingSport Psychology and PerformanceSports and Physical Education Research

Application of representative learning design for assessment of common practice tasks in tennis

Krause, Lyndon, Farrow, Damian, Buszard, Tim, Pinder, Ross, Reid, Machar·2019·Psychology of Sport and Exercise

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.11.008

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krause, L., Farrow, D., Buszard, T., Pinder, R., & Reid, M.
Affiliations
Victoria University (AU)
Corresponding author
Krause, Lyndon
Venue
Psychology of Sport and Exercise
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
41
Pages
36-45
ISSN
1469-0292 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2901561299
Cited by
30
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4
FWCI
2.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology of sport and exercise (publishedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Sports and Physical Education Research
Keywords
tennis, representativeness, ball speed, ball spin, player movement, junior tennis players, practice assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review