Cited by 187Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorStress Responses and CortisolNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Intranasal oxytocin attenuates the cortisol response to physical stress: a dose-response study

Cardoso, Christopher, Ellenbogen, Mark A., Orlando, Mark Anthony, Bacon, Simon L., Joober, Ridha·2013·Psychoneuroendocrinology

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Intranasal oxytocin attenuates cortisol levels during social stress inductions. However, no research to date has documented the dose-response relation between intranasal oxytocin administration and cortisol, and researchers examining intranasal oxytocin have not examined the cortisol response to physical stress. We therefore examined the effects of 24IU and 48IU of intranasal oxytocin on the cortisol response to vigorous exercise. METHOD Seventeen males participated in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, and within-subject experiment. Participants engaged in vigorous exercise for 60min following the administration of placebo or intranasal oxytocin on three occasions. Saliva samples and mood ratings were collected at eight intervals across each session. RESULTS Salivary cortisol concentrations changed over time, peaking after 60min of exercise (quadratic: F(1,16)=7.349, p=.015, partial η(2)=.32). The 24IU dose of oxytocin attenuated cortisol levels relative to placebo (F(1,16)=4.496, p=.05, partial η(2)=.22) and the 48IU dose, although the latter fell just short of statistical significance (F(1,16)=3.054, p=.10, partial η(2)=.16). There was no difference in the cortisol response to exercise in participants who were administered 48IU of intranasal oxytocin relative to placebo. Intranasal oxytocin had no effect on mood. CONCLUSION This is the first study to demonstrate that the effect of intranasal oxytocin on salivary cortisol is dose-dependent, and that intranasal oxytocin attenuates cortisol levels in response to physical stress. Future research using exogenous oxytocin will need to consider the possibility of dose-response relations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.07.013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 187

Authors
Cardoso, C., Ellenbogen, M. A., Orlando, M. A., Bacon, S. L., & Joober, R.
Affiliations
  • Concordia University (CA)
  • Montreal Heart Institute (CA)
  • Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA)
Corresponding author
Ellenbogen, Mark A.
Venue
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-03
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
399-407
ISSN
0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1981648524
Cited by
187
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 1
FWCI
22.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
intranasal oxytocin, salivary cortisol, physical stress, high-intensity exercise, dose-response relationship, stress response attenuation, mood, social stress
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Oxytocin, Saliva, Stress, Physiological, Time Factors, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review