Cited by 103Neural dynamics and brain functionNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesStress Responses and Cortisol

Working memory-related frontal theta activity is decreased under acute stress

Gärtner, Matti, Rohde-Liebenau, Lea, Grimm, Simone, Bajbouj, Malek·2014·Psychoneuroendocrinology

Abstract

Acute stress impairs prefrontal cortex (PFC) function and has detrimental effects on working memory (WM) performance. Converging evidence from electrophysiological studies suggests a close link between WM processes and frontal theta (FT) activity (4-8 Hz). However, the effect of stress on WM-related FT activity has not been investigated yet. To shed light on this topic we acquired EEG data from 31 healthy male subjects who underwent a stressful and a neutral control condition. In both conditions, they performed an n-back WM task at two different difficulty levels. Our results showed that WM-related FT activity was decreased under stress. Behaviorally, we found performance impairments under stress in the difficult task condition that were related to FT decreases. Increased cortisol levels indicated a successful moderate stress induction. These findings indicate that FT is a potential neurobiological marker for intact PFC functioning during WM and further supports the recently made assumption that FT acts in the PFC to optimize performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.02.009

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Stress-induced impairment of working memory during an N-back task has also been linked to electrophysiological signs of PFC dysfunction: cognitive impairment correlated with reduced PFC theta activity.

    “Stress-induced impairment of working memory during an N-back task has also been linked to electrophysiological signs of PFC dysfunction: cognitive impairment correlated with reduced PFC theta activity33.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gärtner, M., Rohde-Liebenau, L., Grimm, S., & Bajbouj, M.
Affiliations
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Venue
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
43
Pages
105-113
ISSN
0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2115138059
Cited by
103
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2
FWCI
3.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
acute stress, working memory, frontal theta activity, prefrontal cortex, n-back task, cortisol, stress-induced cognitive impairment, EEG biomarkers, stress induction
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adult, Electroencephalography, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Middle Aged, Psychomotor Performance, Stress, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review