Cited by 26Stress Responses and CortisolWorkplace Health and Well-beingStress and Burnout Research

Associations of work stress with hair cortisol concentrations – initial findings from a prospective study

Herr, Raphael M., Almer, Christian, Loerbroks, Adrian, Barrech, Amira, Elfantel, Irina, Siegrist, Johannes, Gündel, Harald, Angerer, Peter +1 more·2018·Psychoneuroendocrinology

Abstract

There is ample evidence supporting the link between stress at the workplace and physical and mental health. One of the pathways potentially mediating those associations may involve the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, with cortisol as an end product. While theoretically plausible, findings on the association of self-reported work stress with hair cortisol concentrations (HCC) are inconclusive, being potentially biased by omitted pertinent factors. This issue can be addressed, among others, by eliminating time-invariant factors through consideration of variation within persons over time. To this end, the present study examined the association between variation in HCC and perceived work stress - as assessed by the Effort-Reward-Imbalance (ERI) model - between two points in time (t1 and t2) over one year in a sample of 40 male factory workers. Neither a cross-sectional association, nor a link between change in ERI and HCC levels at t2 was observed. There was however a robust association of the change in ERI with the change of HCC. This effect was independent of baseline HCC and other confounders (Beta = 0.414, S.E. = 0.155, p = 0.012). Accordingly, this is the first study revealing prospective evidence for the associations of work stress with HCC, while excluding potentially time-stable confounding factors, like genetic factors or phenotypic hair color.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.01.011

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herr, R. M., Almer, C., Loerbroks, A., Barrech, A., Elfantel, I., Siegrist, J., Gündel, H., Angerer, P., & Li, J.
Affiliations
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
Corresponding author
Herr, Raphael M.
Venue
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
89
Pages
134-137
ISSN
0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2794821947
Cited by
26
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01EL1409B)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
occupational stress, hair cortisol, effort-reward imbalance model, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, industrial workers, within-person variability, prospective associations
MeSH terms
Occupational Stress, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Hair, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Male, Middle Aged, Pituitary-Adrenal System, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Saliva, Stress, Psychological, Workplace, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review