The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hashtag activism and message frames among social movement organizations: Semantic network analysis and thematic analysis of Twitter during the #MeToo movement
Abstract
Abstract During the #MeToo movement, social movement organizations (SMOs) played a crucial role in the online mobilization by utilizing various message frames and appealing hashtags during the social movement. Applying a co-creational approach and using framing as a theoretical framework, the study explored how SMOs use words and hashtags to participate in the #MeToo movement through Twitter. Based on both semantic network analysis and thematic analysis methods, findings of the study enhance literature of social movement organizations and activism as well as provide practical implications for effective social movement campaigns.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S. S., & Faust, K. (1994) · Cited by 17,961
Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment
Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611 · Cited by 9,953
Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide
Jenkins, H., & Plasencia, A. (2017) · Is the Universe a Hologram? · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262036016.003.0012 · Cited by 6,944
THE LOGIC OF CONNECTIVE ACTION: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2012.670661 · Cited by 3,116
Convergence culture: where old and new media collide
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-5465 · Cited by 2,038
Multiple Jeopardy, Multiple Consciousness: The Context of a Black Feminist Ideology
King, D. K. (1988) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/494491 · Cited by 1,881
The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139198752 · Cited by 1,862
Emotions and Information Diffusion in Social Media—Sentiment of Microblogs and Sharing Behavior
Stieglitz, S., & Dang-Xuan, L. (2013) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222290408 · Cited by 1,604
The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2016) · Civic Media · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9970.003.0006 · Cited by 1,217
Cited by
Uniting the Tribes: Using Text for Marketing Insight
Berger, J., Humphreys, A., Ludwig, S., Moe, W. W., Netzer, O., & Schweidel, D. A. (2020) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/0022242919873106 · Cited by 742
Himelboim, I., & Golan, G. J. (2023) · Journal of Interactive Advertising · doi:10.1080/15252019.2022.2139653 · Cited by 42
Zhang, R., Li, H., Chen, A., Liu, Z., & Lee, Y.-C. (2024) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051241290845 · Cited by 23
Image-based Abuse: Debate and Reflections on the “Iveco Case” in Spain on Twitter
Idoiaga Mondragon, N., Santamaria, M. D., Txertudi, M. B., & Saez, I. A. (2022) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260520967143 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Xiong, Y., Cho, M., & Boatwright, B.
- Venue
- Public Relations Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 10-23
- ISSN
- 0363-8111 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2901886042
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 85
- FWCI
- 63.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hashtag activism and message frames among social movement organizations: Semantic network analysis and thematic analysis of Twitter during the #MeToo movement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.10.014
- The paper
- Xiong, Y., Cho, M., & Boatwright, B. (2019). Hashtag activism and message frames among social movement organizations: Semantic network analysis and thematic analysis of Twitter during the #MeToo movement. Public Relations Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.10.014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.