Cited by 11Gender, Feminism, and MediaStalking, Cyberstalking, and HarassmentSexual Assault and Victimization Studies

Image-based Abuse: Debate and Reflections on the “Iveco Case” in Spain on Twitter

Open access
Idoiaga Mondragon, Nahia, Santamaria, Maria Dosil, Txertudi, Maitane Belasko, Saez, Israel Alonso·2022·Journal of Interpersonal Violence

Abstract

The instance of image-based abuse that ended in the victim’s suicide, known as the “Iveco case,” had an unprecedented social impact in Spain in 2019. This case provoked a great social reaction and became particularly viral on social networks such as Twitter. The present research investigates how this case has been dealt with through Twitter discourse. In particular, this study aimed to identify the main elements that could explain how people engaged with the problem of nonconsensual sharing of sexually explicit images in general, and with this case in particular. In total, 1,895 tweets with the word “Iveco” written in Spain were selected by streaming API, and their content was analyzed by lexical analysis using Iramuteq software (Reinert method). This software carries out an automatic lexical classification cluster analysis that groups the most significant words and text segments according to their co-occurrence. The results revealed that, on Twitter, it was stressed that the victim was a married woman with children who had practiced sexting. However, in response to this initial description, many voices also emerged that labelled this image-based abuse as gender-based online violence. Criticism was aimed at both the passivity of the company, and the attitude of hundreds of thousands of people who share the sexting video by WhatsApp groups without permission. Consequently, several feminist mobilizations emerged, framing this case within a sexist and patriarchal society and asking for accountability. However, in contrast, countermovements such as the #NotAllMen also emerged.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0886260520967143

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 83 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Idoiaga Mondragon, N., Santamaria, M. D., Txertudi, M. B., & Saez, I. A.
Affiliations
  • University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, BI, Spain
  • University of the Basque Country (ES)
Venue
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2020-10-27
Volume
37
Issue
9-10
Pages
NP7178-NP7201
ISSN
  • 0886-2605 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6518
OpenAlex
W3094016444
Cited by
11
References
83
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
3.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
image-based sexual abuse, Twitter discourse, sexting, feminist activism, WhatsApp groups, corporate accountability, Spain
MeSH terms
Child, Child Abuse, Female, Humans, Sexual Behavior, Spain, Text Messaging, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review