Cited by 1,881Feminist Theory and Gender StudiesRace, History, and American SocietyGender and Feminist Studies

Multiple Jeopardy, Multiple Consciousness: The Context of a Black Feminist Ideology

King, Deborah K.·1988·Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/494491

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Identity categories such as race and gender are mutually constituted and mutually constitutive.

    “The metaphor of intersection, as formulated by Crenshaw (1989Crenshaw ( , 1991)), Hill Collins (1990), and King (1988), among others, is used to describe the ways in which identity categories such as race and gender are both mutually constituted and mutually constitutive.”

    From Intersectionality and Press Coverage of Political Campaigns (2017) · cites this paper as King 1988

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
King, D. K.
Corresponding author
King, Deborah K.
Venue
Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society
Published
1988-10
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
42-72
ISSN
  • 0097-9740 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-6943
OpenAlex
W2009551222
Cited by
1,881
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 72 · 2025: 108 · 2024: 88 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 119 · 2021: 129 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 136 · 2018: 101 · 2017: 98 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 84 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 70
FWCI
11.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Signs (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
Black feminism, consciousness, intersectionality, race, gender, Black women

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review