The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why is changing health-related behaviour so difficult?
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that six common errors made in attempts to change behaviour have prevented the implementation of the scientific evidence base derived from psychology and sociology; to suggest a new approach which incorporates recent developments in the behavioural sciences. STUDY DESIGN: The role of health behaviours in the origin of the current epidemic of non-communicable disease is observed to have driven attempts to change behaviour. It is noted that most efforts to change health behaviours have had limited success. This paper suggests that in policy-making, discussions about behaviour change are subject to six common errors and that these errors have made the business of health-related behaviour change much more difficult than it needs to be. METHODS: Overview of policy and practice attempts to change health-related behaviour. RESULTS: The reasons why knowledge and learning about behaviour have made so little progress in alcohol, dietary and physical inactivity-related disease prevention are considered, and an alternative way of thinking about the behaviours involved is suggested. This model harnesses recent developments in the behavioural sciences. CONCLUSION: It is important to understand the conditions preceding behaviour psychologically and sociologically and to combine psychological ideas about the automatic and reflective systems with sociological ideas about social practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reflective and Impulsive Determinants of Social Behavior
Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1 · Cited by 3,984
The worldwide epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus—present and future perspectives
Chen, L., Magliano, D. J., & Zimmet, P. Z. (2012) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/nrendo.2011.183 · Cited by 2,227
Behaviour change theory and evidence: a presentation to Government
Michie, S., & West, R. (2013) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2011.649445 · Cited by 259
Why is it hard to make progress in assessing children's decision-making competence?
Hein, I. M., Troost, P. W., Broersma, A., de Vries, M. C., Daams, J. G., & Lindauer, R. J. L. (2015) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/1472-6939-16-1 · Cited by 191
Cited by
Intervention strategies to improve nutrition and health behaviours before conception
Barker, M., Dombrowski, S. U., Colbourn, T., Fall, C. H. D., Kriznik, N. M., Lawrence, W. T., Norris, S. A., Ngaiza, G., Patel, D., Skordis-Worrall, J., et al. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30313-1 · Cited by 377
Self-citationChanging Behavior Using the Model of Action Phases
Keller, L., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2020) · The Handbook of Behavior Change · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.006 · Cited by 147
Thomas, J. G., Bond, D. S., Raynor, H. A., Papandonatos, G. D., & Wing, R. R. (2019) · Obesity · doi:10.1002/oby.22410 · Cited by 108
Järvelä-Reijonen, E., Karhunen, L., Sairanen, E., Muotka, J., Lindroos, S., Laitinen, J., Puttonen, S., Peuhkuri, K., Hallikainen, M., Pihlajamäki, J., et al. (2018) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-018-0654-8 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Kelly, M. P., & Barker, M.
- Venue
- Public Health
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-07
- Volume
- 136
- Pages
- 109-116
- ISSN
- 0033-3506 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2375143166
- Cited by
- 1,113
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 108.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why is changing health-related behaviour so difficult? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.puhe.2016.03.030
- The paper
- Kelly, M. P., & Barker, M. (2016). Why is changing health-related behaviour so difficult? Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2016.03.030
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.